First‐trimester pre‐eclampsia screening and adverse pregnancy outcomes beyond pre‐eclampsia

OBJECTIVE: To determine if those screened as high-risk for preterm pre-eclampsia at first-trimester Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF)-based screening and given aspirin are at higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, even after adjusting for pre-eclampsia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 1623 ethnically Chinese women who received FMF-based pre-eclampsia screening, and subsequently delivered within our hospital system. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between screen-positives (high risk, given aspirin) and screen-negatives, and adjusted by pre-eclampsia status and any hypertension in pregnancy. RESULTS: After adjustment for pre-eclampsia, screen-positives still delivered earlier (-0.7 weeks, P < 0.001), with a higher rate of preterm birth (PTB) before 37 weeks (odds ratio [OR] 2.413, P = 0.002). Birth weight centiles in the screen-positive group were lower (-8.3, P = 0.001), with small-for-gestational-age (SGA) being more common in the screen-positive group (OR 2.697, P < 0.001). Emergency cesarean was more common (OR 2.943, P < 0.001), rate of admission to neonatal intensive care unit was higher (OR 2.044, P = 0.014), and stillbirths were more common (OR 5.131, P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: The risks for SGA/fetal growth restriction and PTB were significantly higher in those who screened positive at FMF first-trimester pre-eclampsia screening, even after adjusting for pre-eclampsia, and they may benefit from increased surveillance. Components of FMF-based first-trimester pre-eclampsia screening overlap substantially with uteroplacental great obstetrical syndromes, and help to identify a broader placental-risk phenotype. Future research may explore how this information could be further operationalized-through refinement of risk thresholds and incorporation of adjunctive strategies. Nevertheless, the lack of highly effective strategies to further stratify and prevent SGA/fetal growth restriction and spontaneous PTB remains a challenge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70995
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

First‐trimester pre‐eclampsia screening and adverse pregnancy outcomes beyond pre‐eclampsia

L. K. K. Lee, Su‐Chen Ho, Lin Wai Chan
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

First‐trimester pre‐eclampsia screening and adverse pregnancy outcomes beyond pre‐eclampsia

L. K. K. Lee, Su‐Chen Ho, Lin Wai Chan
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if those screened as high-risk for preterm pre-eclampsia at first-trimester Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF)-based screening and given aspirin are at higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, even after adjusting for pre-eclampsia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 1623 ethnically Chinese women who received FMF-based pre-eclampsia screening, and subsequently delivered within our hospital system. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between screen-positives (high risk, given aspirin) and screen-negatives, and adjusted by pre-eclampsia status and any hypertension in pregnancy. RESULTS: After adjustment for pre-eclampsia, screen-positives still delivered earlier (-0.7 weeks, P < 0.001), with a higher rate of preterm birth (PTB) before 37 weeks (odds ratio [OR] 2.413, P = 0.002). Birth weight centiles in the screen-positive group were lower (-8.3, P = 0.001), with small-for-gestational-age (SGA) being more common in the screen-positive group (OR 2.697, P < 0.001). Emergency cesarean was more common (OR 2.943, P < 0.001), rate of admission to neonatal intensive care unit was higher (OR 2.044, P = 0.014), and stillbirths were more common (OR 5.131, P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: The risks for SGA/fetal growth restriction and PTB were significantly higher in those who screened positive at FMF first-trimester pre-eclampsia screening, even after adjusting for pre-eclampsia, and they may benefit from increased surveillance. Components of FMF-based first-trimester pre-eclampsia screening overlap substantially with uteroplacental great obstetrical syndromes, and help to identify a broader placental-risk phenotype. Future research may explore how this information could be further operationalized-through refinement of risk thresholds and incorporation of adjunctive strategies. Nevertheless, the lack of highly effective strategies to further stratify and prevent SGA/fetal growth restriction and spontaneous PTB remains a challenge.

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.