Ethical Language Assessment in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Contexts: A Guide for School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists

Purpose: This tutorial presents a social justice approach to ethical language assessments with multilingual/multidialectal learners. Ethical language assessments include practices that are compliant with Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and state regulations, evidence based, culturally and linguistically sustaining, of the highest quality, in the best interest of the child and family, and conducive to equitable educational opportunities and outcomes. Method/Approach: Power-deFur's (in press) seven-step ethical decision-making model is implemented to demonstrate how school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs) can resolve dilemmas in selecting assessment methods, multidisciplinary collaboration, and family–school partnerships. Case study scenarios illustrate how ethical language assessment practices inform special education eligibility determinations and reduce disproportionality in culturally and linguistically diverse contexts. Conclusions: Ethical language assessment practices that best inform differential diagnosis of language learning disabilities and appropriate educational supports for multilingual/multidialectal learners include sociolinguistic methods, which converge evidence from multilingual dynamic assessments, teacher reports, and parent interviews. SLPs' ethical responsibilities extend beyond direct assessment to uphold standards of ethical practice in all aspects of service delivery, continuous learning, and advocacy. Implications for Practice: Individual actions and accountability contribute to systemic change and educational equity. This tutorial provides concrete actions and resources (see Appendix A ) that individual SLPs can use to critically evaluate and transform their assessment practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_persp-25-00265
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Language Assessment in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Contexts: A Guide for School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists

Grace Frutos, Julie C. Smith
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Language Development and Disorders
article

Ethical Language Assessment in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Contexts: A Guide for School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists

Grace Frutos, Julie C. Smith
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This tutorial presents a social justice approach to ethical language assessments with multilingual/multidialectal learners. Ethical language assessments include practices that are compliant with Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and state regulations, evidence based, culturally and linguistically sustaining, of the highest quality, in the best interest of the child and family, and conducive to equitable educational opportunities and outcomes. Method/Approach: Power-deFur's (in press) seven-step ethical decision-making model is implemented to demonstrate how school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs) can resolve dilemmas in selecting assessment methods, multidisciplinary collaboration, and family–school partnerships. Case study scenarios illustrate how ethical language assessment practices inform special education eligibility determinations and reduce disproportionality in culturally and linguistically diverse contexts. Conclusions: Ethical language assessment practices that best inform differential diagnosis of language learning disabilities and appropriate educational supports for multilingual/multidialectal learners include sociolinguistic methods, which converge evidence from multilingual dynamic assessments, teacher reports, and parent interviews. SLPs' ethical responsibilities extend beyond direct assessment to uphold standards of ethical practice in all aspects of service delivery, continuous learning, and advocacy. Implications for Practice: Individual actions and accountability contribute to systemic change and educational equity. This tutorial provides concrete actions and resources (see Appendix A ) that individual SLPs can use to critically evaluate and transform their assessment practices.

Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
New York City Department of Education (US), University of Virginia (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.