Comparison of prone versus supine position in assessment of small bowel and rectal dose in pelvic radiotherapy for carcinoma cervix

Background: Pelvic irradiation for cervical cancer is frequently associated with gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities due to radiation exposure to adjacent organs at risk (OAR). Optimizing patient positioning and organ preparation may reduce these effects. Aims and Objectives: This prospective study evaluated the dosimetric impact of prone versus supine positioning during pelvic radiotherapy planning in patients with cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients with FIGO stage II–III cervical cancer undergoing curative pelvic radiotherapy were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography simulation in both prone (with belly board) and supine positions using standardized bowel and bladder preparation. Target volumes and OAR were contoured, and position-specific plans were generated using institutional techniques (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and arc therapy) with uniform planning objectives. Dose–volume parameters for OAR and target volumes were compared, and correlations were analyzed, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Stage II disease was present in 36 of 40 patients (90%). Prone positioning significantly reduced the small bowel dose compared with the supine position (25.15 vs. 29.36 Gy; P=0.004), while doses to the bladder, rectum, clinical target volume (CTV), and planned target volume (PTV) did not differ significantly between positions (P>0.05). A significant correlation between bladder and small bowel doses was observed in the prone position (ρ=0.606; P=0.002), but not in the supine position. Small bowel doses did not vary significantly across radiotherapy techniques, whereas bladder, rectum, CTV, and PTV doses showed significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion: Prone belly board positioning significantly reduced the small bowel dose without compromising target coverage in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Bladder and small bowel doses were significantly correlated in the prone position.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v17i4.5166
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of prone versus supine position in assessment of small bowel and rectal dose in pelvic radiotherapy for carcinoma cervix

Lalitha Subramanian, Jacob Arulraj P, Maheshwaran K, Agnes Lalitha
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Comparison of prone versus supine position in assessment of small bowel and rectal dose in pelvic radiotherapy for carcinoma cervix

Lalitha Subramanian, Jacob Arulraj P, Maheshwaran K, Agnes Lalitha
article en

Abstract

Background: Pelvic irradiation for cervical cancer is frequently associated with gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities due to radiation exposure to adjacent organs at risk (OAR). Optimizing patient positioning and organ preparation may reduce these effects. Aims and Objectives: This prospective study evaluated the dosimetric impact of prone versus supine positioning during pelvic radiotherapy planning in patients with cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients with FIGO stage II–III cervical cancer undergoing curative pelvic radiotherapy were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography simulation in both prone (with belly board) and supine positions using standardized bowel and bladder preparation. Target volumes and OAR were contoured, and position-specific plans were generated using institutional techniques (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and arc therapy) with uniform planning objectives. Dose–volume parameters for OAR and target volumes were compared, and correlations were analyzed, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Stage II disease was present in 36 of 40 patients (90%). Prone positioning significantly reduced the small bowel dose compared with the supine position (25.15 vs. 29.36 Gy; P=0.004), while doses to the bladder, rectum, clinical target volume (CTV), and planned target volume (PTV) did not differ significantly between positions (P>0.05). A significant correlation between bladder and small bowel doses was observed in the prone position (ρ=0.606; P=0.002), but not in the supine position. Small bowel doses did not vary significantly across radiotherapy techniques, whereas bladder, rectum, CTV, and PTV doses showed significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion: Prone belly board positioning significantly reduced the small bowel dose without compromising target coverage in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Bladder and small bowel doses were significantly correlated in the prone position.

Asian Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 17(4)
Government Medical College Thoothukudi (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.