Quantifying carbon emissions from different urban slurry resource utilization pathways: a life cycle assessment approach

Abstract Efficient utilization of waste slurry resources is a pivotal strategy in urban engineering construction, aligning with the global “dual carbon” goals of sustainability and carbon neutrality. To quantitatively assess the carbon emission intensity and mitigation potential associated with the utilization and disposal of urban waste slurry (UWS), a life cycle assessment (LCA) framework was adopted. A partial cradle-to-site LCA was conducted for a representative project in Shanghai, China, encompassing all key stages from material extraction to on-site application. An inventory of the materials and fossil fuel energy utilized during construction was compiled to calculate the primary energy consumption and the corresponding embodied carbon. Carbon emission accounting using SimaPro software was conducted for three UWS resource utilization methods: subgrade backfill material (SBM), scour protection backfill material (SPBM), and fluid self-compacting backfill material (FSCBM). Based on the analysis results, recommendations were proposed to enhance carbon emission reduction measures for utilization. The results indicate the following order of carbon emissions from UWS: SPBM (93.1 kg CO 2 -eq/m 3 ) > FSCBM (47.1 kg CO 2 -eq/m 3 ) > SBM (41.8 kg CO 2 -eq/m 3 ). The solidification treatment of UWS has emerged as the dominant contributor to carbon emissions across all utilization pathways, accounting for 59.33%, 61.33%, and 64.12% of the total emissions for SBM, FSCBM, and SPBM, respectively. Notably, in the SPBM route, transportation emissions alone account for 37.8% of the total emissions. These findings suggest that the adoption of low-carbon curing agents and the optimization of transportation methods can significantly reduce overall carbon emissions. Furthermore, from a long-term environmental perspective, direct landfill disposal of UWS constitutes the least sustainable management option, with the highest carbon emissions at 123.62 kg CO₂-eq/m 3 . Compared to plain concrete and recycled aggregate concrete per unit volume, SBM achieves significant carbon reductions of 51.3% and 22.0%, respectively. Consequently, the resource utilization of UWS, especially through SBM, demonstrates significant potential to mitigate environmental impacts, offering a promising pathway for sustainable development in the construction materials sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Low-carbon Materials and Green Construction
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44242-026-00101-4
Primary Topic
Tailings Management and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying carbon emissions from different urban slurry resource utilization pathways: a life cycle assessment approach

Chengzhe Song, Zhenhua Duan, Qingmei Yang, Jingxun Kong et al.
Low-carbon Materials and Green Construction
Tailings Management and Properties
article

Quantifying carbon emissions from different urban slurry resource utilization pathways: a life cycle assessment approach

Chengzhe Song, Zhenhua Duan, Qingmei Yang, Jingxun Kong, Lingli Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Efficient utilization of waste slurry resources is a pivotal strategy in urban engineering construction, aligning with the global “dual carbon” goals of sustainability and carbon neutrality. To quantitatively assess the carbon emission intensity and mitigation potential associated with the utilization and disposal of urban waste slurry (UWS), a life cycle assessment (LCA) framework was adopted. A partial cradle-to-site LCA was conducted for a representative project in Shanghai, China, encompassing all key stages from material extraction to on-site application. An inventory of the materials and fossil fuel energy utilized during construction was compiled to calculate the primary energy consumption and the corresponding embodied carbon. Carbon emission accounting using SimaPro software was conducted for three UWS resource utilization methods: subgrade backfill material (SBM), scour protection backfill material (SPBM), and fluid self-compacting backfill material (FSCBM). Based on the analysis results, recommendations were proposed to enhance carbon emission reduction measures for utilization. The results indicate the following order of carbon emissions from UWS: SPBM (93.1 kg CO 2 -eq/m 3 ) > FSCBM (47.1 kg CO 2 -eq/m 3 ) > SBM (41.8 kg CO 2 -eq/m 3 ). The solidification treatment of UWS has emerged as the dominant contributor to carbon emissions across all utilization pathways, accounting for 59.33%, 61.33%, and 64.12% of the total emissions for SBM, FSCBM, and SPBM, respectively. Notably, in the SPBM route, transportation emissions alone account for 37.8% of the total emissions. These findings suggest that the adoption of low-carbon curing agents and the optimization of transportation methods can significantly reduce overall carbon emissions. Furthermore, from a long-term environmental perspective, direct landfill disposal of UWS constitutes the least sustainable management option, with the highest carbon emissions at 123.62 kg CO₂-eq/m 3 . Compared to plain concrete and recycled aggregate concrete per unit volume, SBM achieves significant carbon reductions of 51.3% and 22.0%, respectively. Consequently, the resource utilization of UWS, especially through SBM, demonstrates significant potential to mitigate environmental impacts, offering a promising pathway for sustainable development in the construction materials sector.

Low-carbon Materials and Green ConstructionVol. 4(1)
Tongji University (CN), Liaoning Planning and Design Institute of Post and Telecommunication (CN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Tailings Management and Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.