Rehabilitation technology for hospitalised older adults: a scoping review

PURPOSE: There is limited information on rehabilitation technology and its ability to support hospitalised older adults. This review aims to examine the extent and types of rehabilitation technology used for hospitalised older adults, assess technology readiness levels (TRLs), identify outcome variables and evaluate the level of evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted across six electronic databases (Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus) to evaluate studies investigating the use of rehabilitation technology among hospitalised older adults, in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. RESULTS: The search yielded 5310 records, with 23 meeting inclusion criteria and included for final analysis. Robotics were the most common rehabilitation technology, in six studies, followed by games in five studies, virtual reality in four studies and mobile applications in three studies. Rehabilitation technology mainly addressed functional mobility and physical performance, and functional independence and activities of daily living. Although the median TRL was high, with 8 studies achieving Level 1b evidence quality, variability in outcome measures, participants and intervention protocols limits the strength of available evidence. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation technologies show promise for supporting hospitalised older adults; however, more research is needed to determine feasibility, cost-effectiveness and implementation in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2026.2642305
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rehabilitation technology for hospitalised older adults: a scoping review

Allison Hunder, Claire Rockliff, Antonio Miguel Cruz, Kiran Parmar et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Rehabilitation technology for hospitalised older adults: a scoping review

Allison Hunder, Claire Rockliff, Antonio Miguel Cruz, Kiran Parmar, Snaha Sunny
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is limited information on rehabilitation technology and its ability to support hospitalised older adults. This review aims to examine the extent and types of rehabilitation technology used for hospitalised older adults, assess technology readiness levels (TRLs), identify outcome variables and evaluate the level of evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted across six electronic databases (Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus) to evaluate studies investigating the use of rehabilitation technology among hospitalised older adults, in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. RESULTS: The search yielded 5310 records, with 23 meeting inclusion criteria and included for final analysis. Robotics were the most common rehabilitation technology, in six studies, followed by games in five studies, virtual reality in four studies and mobile applications in three studies. Rehabilitation technology mainly addressed functional mobility and physical performance, and functional independence and activities of daily living. Although the median TRL was high, with 8 studies achieving Level 1b evidence quality, variability in outcome measures, participants and intervention protocols limits the strength of available evidence. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation technologies show promise for supporting hospitalised older adults; however, more research is needed to determine feasibility, cost-effectiveness and implementation in clinical practice.

Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
University of Waterloo (CA), University of Alberta (CA), Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.