When Dollars Don’t Tell the Whole Story: The Value of Nonprofit Mission Metrics

Measuring nonprofit performance has been a perennial challenge. While current mandated reports require financial information about dollars received and spent, donors and regulators encourage voluntary disclosures of mission activities. Because there are few common measures across different types of nonprofit organizations and no designated reporting mechanism, studying the information value of mission performance has been difficult. We use a database of nonprofit impact-based performance indicators recently made available through GuideStar to investigate the usefulness of information contained in measures we call “mission metrics.” Examining two distinct stakeholders—donors and directors—and controlling for financial and governance factors, we find that donations and executive bonus compensation are positively associated with any improvement in mission metrics. Bonuses, but not donations, are lower in years after all reported metrics decline. These results confirm the value relevance of nonprofit mission metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x261438885
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Dollars Don’t Tell the Whole Story: The Value of Nonprofit Mission Metrics

Daniel Neely, Erica Harris, Linda M. Parsons
Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

When Dollars Don’t Tell the Whole Story: The Value of Nonprofit Mission Metrics

Daniel Neely, Erica Harris, Linda M. Parsons
article en

Abstract

Measuring nonprofit performance has been a perennial challenge. While current mandated reports require financial information about dollars received and spent, donors and regulators encourage voluntary disclosures of mission activities. Because there are few common measures across different types of nonprofit organizations and no designated reporting mechanism, studying the information value of mission performance has been difficult. We use a database of nonprofit impact-based performance indicators recently made available through GuideStar to investigate the usefulness of information contained in measures we call “mission metrics.” Examining two distinct stakeholders—donors and directors—and controlling for financial and governance factors, we find that donations and executive bonus compensation are positively associated with any improvement in mission metrics. Bonuses, but not donations, are lower in years after all reported metrics decline. These results confirm the value relevance of nonprofit mission metrics.

Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance
University of Alabama (US), Florida International University (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Dollars Don’t Tell the Whole Story: The Value of Nonprofit Mission Metrics — Daniel Neely, Erica Harris, et al. · Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS