The reliability and reporting of DNA match strength for uncertain genotype evidence

Informative DNA evidence often yields uninformative results. Most crime laboratories apply binary threshold criteria that discard DNA data and inhibit reporting. The information loss is more common with complex evidence having multiple contributors or little DNA. Probative inculpatory and exculpatory evidence is lost to criminal justice.Probability provides a non-binary way to accurately represent genotype uncertainty. Bayesian models scrutinize evidence data to transform prior to posterior genotype probability. A likelihood ratio (LR) gives the evidential change for a reference. An LR distribution charts the LR values at every reference, for Noncontributor or Contributor categories. Our previous Heliyon paper efficiently constructed dense LR distributions directly from an evidence genotype, without computing any LRs. A distribution can determine LR error rates.This paper applies LR distributions and error rates to reliably report LR results from uncertain genotypes. We present the symmetry between inclusionary and exclusionary match statistics, which have equal mathematical standing. We dissect two low-LR cases, one a criminal conviction and the other an exoneration, illustrating LR reporting, validation, and error rate. We show how thresholds reduce DNA information and when they are unnecessary. We explain why casework field data can be used for genotyping validation.A novel application of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to a genotype's Noncontributor and Contributor LR score distributions generates a continuous ROC curve. The area under the curve (AUC) is an objective measure of discrimination accuracy. We use the AUC to assess genotype accuracy, compare genotyping methods, and understand how data thresholds reduce DNA match information.Probabilistic genotyping examines DNA data to form an uncertain genotype. This single genotype outcome contains everything needed to build its Noncontributor and Contributor LR distributions, calculate error rates, conduct ROC analysis, and measure accuracy. The genotype provides a complete statistical framework, before ever comparing with a reference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heliyon
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2026.e44753
Primary Topic
Forensic and Genetic Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The reliability and reporting of DNA match strength for uncertain genotype evidence

Matthew M. Legler, Jennifer M. Bracamontes, William P. Allan, Mark W. Perlin
Heliyon
Forensic and Genetic Research
article

The reliability and reporting of DNA match strength for uncertain genotype evidence

Matthew M. Legler, Jennifer M. Bracamontes, William P. Allan, Mark W. Perlin
article en

Abstract

Informative DNA evidence often yields uninformative results. Most crime laboratories apply binary threshold criteria that discard DNA data and inhibit reporting. The information loss is more common with complex evidence having multiple contributors or little DNA. Probative inculpatory and exculpatory evidence is lost to criminal justice.Probability provides a non-binary way to accurately represent genotype uncertainty. Bayesian models scrutinize evidence data to transform prior to posterior genotype probability. A likelihood ratio (LR) gives the evidential change for a reference. An LR distribution charts the LR values at every reference, for Noncontributor or Contributor categories. Our previous Heliyon paper efficiently constructed dense LR distributions directly from an evidence genotype, without computing any LRs. A distribution can determine LR error rates.This paper applies LR distributions and error rates to reliably report LR results from uncertain genotypes. We present the symmetry between inclusionary and exclusionary match statistics, which have equal mathematical standing. We dissect two low-LR cases, one a criminal conviction and the other an exoneration, illustrating LR reporting, validation, and error rate. We show how thresholds reduce DNA information and when they are unnecessary. We explain why casework field data can be used for genotyping validation.A novel application of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to a genotype's Noncontributor and Contributor LR score distributions generates a continuous ROC curve. The area under the curve (AUC) is an objective measure of discrimination accuracy. We use the AUC to assess genotype accuracy, compare genotyping methods, and understand how data thresholds reduce DNA match information.Probabilistic genotyping examines DNA data to form an uncertain genotype. This single genotype outcome contains everything needed to build its Noncontributor and Contributor LR distributions, calculate error rates, conduct ROC analysis, and measure accuracy. The genotype provides a complete statistical framework, before ever comparing with a reference.

HeliyonVol. 12(7)
Cybergenetics (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Forensic and Genetic Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.