Efficacy of nostril protector in preventing device-related pressure ulcers during endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery: a within-person quasi-randomized trial

Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel nostril protection device for reducing the incidence, severity, and pain associated with medical device-related pressure ulcers (MDRPUs) in patients undergoing endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery (ETSBS). Methods This within-person, quasi-randomized, patient-blinded, single-center trial included 18 patients who underwent ETSBS. The Nostril Protector (Daiichi Medical, Tokyo, Japan) was applied to one nostril (treatment side), while the contralateral nostril served as the control. The incidence and severity of MDRPUs were assessed using the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) classification. Pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 0, 2, and 4 days postoperatively. Results The incidence of MDRPUs was significantly lower on the treated side than on the control side on postoperative days 2 and 4. Notably, no patients developed grade 2 or higher MDRPUs on the treatment side. While pain scores tended to be lower on the treated side, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions The use of the Nostril Protector effectively reduced the incidence and severity of MDRPUs during ETSBS. Although the reduction in pain was not significant, the device demonstrates clear potential as a preventive measure against MDRPUs in prolonged endoscopic procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-026-01069-5
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of nostril protector in preventing device-related pressure ulcers during endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery: a within-person quasi-randomized trial

Akihiro Inoue, Naohito Hato, Taishin Motooka, Kunihide Aoishi et al.
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

Efficacy of nostril protector in preventing device-related pressure ulcers during endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery: a within-person quasi-randomized trial

Akihiro Inoue, Naohito Hato, Taishin Motooka, Kunihide Aoishi, Naoya Nishida, Satoshi Suehiro
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel nostril protection device for reducing the incidence, severity, and pain associated with medical device-related pressure ulcers (MDRPUs) in patients undergoing endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery (ETSBS). Methods This within-person, quasi-randomized, patient-blinded, single-center trial included 18 patients who underwent ETSBS. The Nostril Protector (Daiichi Medical, Tokyo, Japan) was applied to one nostril (treatment side), while the contralateral nostril served as the control. The incidence and severity of MDRPUs were assessed using the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) classification. Pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 0, 2, and 4 days postoperatively. Results The incidence of MDRPUs was significantly lower on the treated side than on the control side on postoperative days 2 and 4. Notably, no patients developed grade 2 or higher MDRPUs on the treatment side. While pain scores tended to be lower on the treated side, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions The use of the Nostril Protector effectively reduced the incidence and severity of MDRPUs during ETSBS. Although the reduction in pain was not significant, the device demonstrates clear potential as a preventive measure against MDRPUs in prolonged endoscopic procedures.

The Egyptian Journal of OtolaryngologyVol. 42(1)
National Institute of Technology, Niihama College (JP), Ehime University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.