Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering Across Hematoma Volume in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Pooled Analysis of the Four <scp>INTERACT</scp> and <scp>ATACH</scp> ‐2 Trials

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the heterogeneity in treatment effect of intensive blood pressure (BP)-lowering across hematoma volume after acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: We undertook a pooled analysis of individual patient data from the pivotal trials of early intensive BP-lowering in ICH (the Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trial 4 [INTERACT4] and Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage 2 [ATACH-2] studies). The primary outcome was functional recovery, defined by the distribution of scores on modified Rankin scale (mRS). Secondary outcomes were hematoma expansion (HE) over 24 hours, defined by absolute (<0, 0-6, 6-12.5, and >12.5 ml) and relative HE (<0, 0-33, 33-66, and >66%). Generalized linear mixed models with trial as a random effect were conducted. We further assessed effect modification by hematoma volume and plotted the treatment effect curve. RESULTS: Among 6,125 individuals with available hematoma volume, intensive BP-lowering improved functional recovery (odds ratio [OR] for unfavorable shift in mRS score = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82 to 0.99, p = 0.027). In 3,897 participants with available HE, intensive BP-lowering reduced the risk of absolute (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.99, p = 0.043) and relative (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.99, p = 0.034) HE. We found effect modification of treatment on functional outcome and absolute HE by hematoma volume (p for interaction = 0.043 and 0.025, respectively). U-shaped curves were observed, with benefits seen in cases with hematoma volume of 7.5 to 27.5 and 7.0 to 32.5 ml, respectively, both peaking at 20 ml. INTERPRETATION: Early intensive BP-lowering improves functional outcome and reduces HE in ICH. Heterogeneity by hematoma volume indicates the importance of patient selection in future trials and clinical practice. ANN NEUROL 2026.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Neurology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.78216
Primary Topic
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering Across Hematoma Volume in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Pooled Analysis of the Four INTERACT and ATACH ‐2 Trials

Jiguang Wang, Xinwen Ren, Menglu Ouyang, Candice Delcourt et al.
Annals of Neurology
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
article

Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering Across Hematoma Volume in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Pooled Analysis of the Four INTERACT and ATACH ‐2 Trials

Jiguang Wang, Xinwen Ren, Menglu Ouyang, Candice Delcourt, G Li, C. Chen, Yapeng Lin, Hisatomi Arima, Li Ma, Xiao Hu, Leibo Liu, X. Chen, Lili Song, Octávio Marques Pontes‐Neto, Craig S. Anderson, for the INTERACT and ATACH‐2 Investigators, Chao You, Adnan I. Qureshi, Xia Wang, Paula Muñoz‐Venturelli, Qiang Li, Sheila Martins
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the heterogeneity in treatment effect of intensive blood pressure (BP)-lowering across hematoma volume after acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: We undertook a pooled analysis of individual patient data from the pivotal trials of early intensive BP-lowering in ICH (the Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trial 4 [INTERACT4] and Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage 2 [ATACH-2] studies). The primary outcome was functional recovery, defined by the distribution of scores on modified Rankin scale (mRS). Secondary outcomes were hematoma expansion (HE) over 24 hours, defined by absolute (<0, 0-6, 6-12.5, and >12.5 ml) and relative HE (<0, 0-33, 33-66, and >66%). Generalized linear mixed models with trial as a random effect were conducted. We further assessed effect modification by hematoma volume and plotted the treatment effect curve. RESULTS: Among 6,125 individuals with available hematoma volume, intensive BP-lowering improved functional recovery (odds ratio [OR] for unfavorable shift in mRS score = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82 to 0.99, p = 0.027). In 3,897 participants with available HE, intensive BP-lowering reduced the risk of absolute (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.99, p = 0.043) and relative (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.99, p = 0.034) HE. We found effect modification of treatment on functional outcome and absolute HE by hematoma volume (p for interaction = 0.043 and 0.025, respectively). U-shaped curves were observed, with benefits seen in cases with hematoma volume of 7.5 to 27.5 and 7.0 to 32.5 ml, respectively, both peaking at 20 ml. INTERPRETATION: Early intensive BP-lowering improves functional outcome and reduces HE in ICH. Heterogeneity by hematoma volume indicates the importance of patient selection in future trials and clinical practice. ANN NEUROL 2026.

Annals of Neurology
University of Minnesota (US), Universidad del Desarrollo (CL), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), University of Leicester (GB), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Chengdu Medical College (CN), Sichuan University (CN), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Clínica Alemana (CL), Fukuoka University (JP), Hospital Moinhos de Vento (BR), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College (CN), Shanghai East Hospital (CN), NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit (GB), Shanghai Institute of Hypertension (CN), Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto (BR), CentraCare Health System (US), Shanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology (CN), Macquarie University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.