Understanding the Impact of Noise on ECG Biometrics: A Comparative Theoretical and Experimental Analysis

Electrocardiogram (ECG)-based biometrics have emerged as a promising solution for continuous and intrinsic human identification; nevertheless, the robustness of these systems under realistic noise conditions remains a critical challenge for practical deployment. This work presents a theoretical and experimental analysis of how different noise types and levels affect ECG biometric recognition by comparing three methodological families: fiducial-based approaches using morphological features with traditional classifiers such as SVM and k-NN, non-fiducial methods based on signal compression and global descriptors, and Deep Learning models. Controlled distortions and additive noise injection into public ECG databases enable systematic quantification of feature degradation. Experimental validation is performed using the CardioWheel system, a real-world in-vehicle ECG acquisition platform, to evaluate performance under realistic motion and noise conditions. The methodological framework proposed for robustness evaluation and noise-aware training is inherently generic and can be extended to other biometric tasks subject to noise. Results show that different algorithmic families exhibit distinct resilience profiles under noise contamination and reveal a practical signal quality boundary for reliable ECG biometric recognition, with performance deteriorating under severe noise conditions. Noise-aware training improves robustness, particularly for Deep Learning and SVM-based classifiers, highlighting the trade-off between interpretability and robustness. By bridging theoretical analysis and applied experimentation, this work provides practical signal quality guidelines for real-world ECG biometric systems.