Propensity-matched study of liposomal doxorubicin vs. doxorubicin in first-line DLBCL treatment: efficacy and safety

Objective: Given the increasing use of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treatment due to its advantages in reducing adverse reactions, and the uncertainty surrounding its effective dose and corresponding efficacy in DLBCL, this study aims to compare it with the standard dose of conventional doxorubicin (DOX) in first-line DLBCL treatment. Methods: = 323]. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results: < 0.001), with similar cardiac/pneumonia events. Elderly patients (≥60 years) mirrored overall efficacy/safety trends. Conclusion: ] offers a safer and potentially more effective alternative to standard DOX, while low-dose PLD maintains equivalent efficacy. These findings support optimized PLD dosing strategies in DLBCL therapy to enhance safety without compromising outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1769270
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Propensity-matched study of liposomal doxorubicin vs. doxorubicin in first-line DLBCL treatment: efficacy and safety

C. Liao, J. Sun, Xiaohong Tan, Lin Zeng et al.
Frontiers in Medicine
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Propensity-matched study of liposomal doxorubicin vs. doxorubicin in first-line DLBCL treatment: efficacy and safety

C. Liao, J. Sun, Xiaohong Tan, Lin Zeng, Chao Tang, Xuanzhang Li, Hao Cheng, Xianwei Peng, Hong Cen
article en

Abstract

Objective: Given the increasing use of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treatment due to its advantages in reducing adverse reactions, and the uncertainty surrounding its effective dose and corresponding efficacy in DLBCL, this study aims to compare it with the standard dose of conventional doxorubicin (DOX) in first-line DLBCL treatment. Methods: = 323]. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results: < 0.001), with similar cardiac/pneumonia events. Elderly patients (≥60 years) mirrored overall efficacy/safety trends. Conclusion: ] offers a safer and potentially more effective alternative to standard DOX, while low-dose PLD maintains equivalent efficacy. These findings support optimized PLD dosing strategies in DLBCL therapy to enhance safety without compromising outcomes.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Guangxi Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University (CN), Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (CN), Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province, Guangxi Medical University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Propensity-matched study of liposomal doxorubicin vs. doxorubicin in first-line DLBCL treatment: efficacy and safety — C. Liao, J. Sun, et al. · Frontiers in Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS