Adaptive Statics of Existence: La Profilée as a Structural Theory of Stable Change

La Profilée is commonly read as a theory of persistence — an account of what allows systems to endure through transformation. This paper argues for a stronger and more precise characterization: LP is a structural theory of stable change, or, in the terminology developed here, a theory of adaptive statics. The term captures a structure that classical frameworks have not formalized: the invariant conditions under which variation is possible. Classical statics describes systems in equilibrium with no transformation. Classical dynamics describes transformation without structural invariants. LP’s domain is neither. It formalizes the structural constraints that must remain invariant — IR ≤ 1, FCC, F_constitutive — in order for real, continuous transformation to occur without identity loss. These constraints are not conditions on the absence of change. They are conditions on the structural possibility of change. We show that this position resolves the Heraclitean–Parmenidean tension not by choosing a side but by identifying the structural domain each was tracking. We further show that LP’s adaptive statics constitutes a third theoretical position irreducible to either classical statics or dynamics, and that this position is the necessary precondition for any adequate theory of persistence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19360249
Primary Topic
Origins and Evolution of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive Statics of Existence: La Profilée as a Structural Theory of Stable Change

Marc Maibom
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Origins and Evolution of Life
article

Adaptive Statics of Existence: La Profilée as a Structural Theory of Stable Change

Marc Maibom
article en

Abstract

La Profilée is commonly read as a theory of persistence — an account of what allows systems to endure through transformation. This paper argues for a stronger and more precise characterization: LP is a structural theory of stable change, or, in the terminology developed here, a theory of adaptive statics. The term captures a structure that classical frameworks have not formalized: the invariant conditions under which variation is possible. Classical statics describes systems in equilibrium with no transformation. Classical dynamics describes transformation without structural invariants. LP’s domain is neither. It formalizes the structural constraints that must remain invariant — IR ≤ 1, FCC, F_constitutive — in order for real, continuous transformation to occur without identity loss. These constraints are not conditions on the absence of change. They are conditions on the structural possibility of change. We show that this position resolves the Heraclitean–Parmenidean tension not by choosing a side but by identifying the structural domain each was tracking. We further show that LP’s adaptive statics constitutes a third theoretical position irreducible to either classical statics or dynamics, and that this position is the necessary precondition for any adequate theory of persistence.

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Origins and Evolution of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.