Innovating business models for circular and regenerative outcomes: Carbon insetting practices in European port ecosystems

Ports are strategic hubs within global value chains and face increasing pressure to decarbonize while generating local socioeconomic value. This study examines how European ports frame and justify value chain mitigation actions that resemble carbon insetting in sustainability disclosures shaped by European Union (EU) climate policy and European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)-related accountability pressures. Rather than treating insetting as an operationally verified practice, this study conceptualizes it as a claimability-sensitive construct and analyzes how insetting-like actions are articulated and rendered more or less credible in public reporting. Drawing on stakeholder theory, the knowledge-based view, absorptive capacity, and dynamic capabilities, this study explores how digitalization and knowledge management (KM) are presented as enablers of credible insetting by enhancing measurement, verification, and shared learning across heterogeneous actors. Methodologically, this study employs a qualitative, directed content analysis of sustainability reports and website disclosures from leading European ports to examine how insetting is framed under evolving EU and International Maritime Organization (IMO) climate regimes and in alignment with ESRS. An operational definition of insetting, consistent with Gold Standard and Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) value chain guidance, is developed alongside a coding scheme addressing scope, additionality, accounting boundaries, metrics, and digital enablers. The findings reveal variation in disclosure-based readiness, distinguishing generic decarbonization narratives from insetting-like claims. The analysis shows how ports construct value chain mitigation claims and how disclosure varies in its capacity to support accountability and claimability. This study advances the Insetting-Enabled BMI (IE-BMI) framework as a conceptual synthesis of recurring disclosure-based configurations, providing a theoretically grounded platform for future empirical testing using independent operational evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2026.101033
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovating business models for circular and regenerative outcomes: Carbon insetting practices in European port ecosystems

Nicola Raimo, Assunta Di Vaio, Anum Zaffar, Filippo Vitolla et al.
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Coastal and Marine Management
article

Innovating business models for circular and regenerative outcomes: Carbon insetting practices in European port ecosystems

Nicola Raimo, Assunta Di Vaio, Anum Zaffar, Filippo Vitolla, Elisa Van Engelenhoven
article en

Abstract

Ports are strategic hubs within global value chains and face increasing pressure to decarbonize while generating local socioeconomic value. This study examines how European ports frame and justify value chain mitigation actions that resemble carbon insetting in sustainability disclosures shaped by European Union (EU) climate policy and European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)-related accountability pressures. Rather than treating insetting as an operationally verified practice, this study conceptualizes it as a claimability-sensitive construct and analyzes how insetting-like actions are articulated and rendered more or less credible in public reporting. Drawing on stakeholder theory, the knowledge-based view, absorptive capacity, and dynamic capabilities, this study explores how digitalization and knowledge management (KM) are presented as enablers of credible insetting by enhancing measurement, verification, and shared learning across heterogeneous actors. Methodologically, this study employs a qualitative, directed content analysis of sustainability reports and website disclosures from leading European ports to examine how insetting is framed under evolving EU and International Maritime Organization (IMO) climate regimes and in alignment with ESRS. An operational definition of insetting, consistent with Gold Standard and Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) value chain guidance, is developed alongside a coding scheme addressing scope, additionality, accounting boundaries, metrics, and digital enablers. The findings reveal variation in disclosure-based readiness, distinguishing generic decarbonization narratives from insetting-like claims. The analysis shows how ports construct value chain mitigation claims and how disclosure varies in its capacity to support accountability and claimability. This study advances the Insetting-Enabled BMI (IE-BMI) framework as a conceptual synthesis of recurring disclosure-based configurations, providing a theoretically grounded platform for future empirical testing using independent operational evidence.

Journal of Innovation & KnowledgeVol. 16
Parthenope University of Naples (IT), LUM Jean Monnet University (IT)
Università degli Studi di Napoli Parthenope
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.