External validation of ECPR prognostic models derived from pre-ECMO indicators in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Objective: To externally validate previously published prognostic models developed exclusively from pre-extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) variables in a contemporary ECPR cohort. Methods: We conducted a bicenter retrospective external validation of four published pre-ECPR prognostic models (Lee, RESCUE-IHCA, CHIU-S1, and CHIU-S2) in adult patients treated with ECPR between January 2015 and December 2024. Model performance was evaluated for in-hospital survival and favorable neurological outcome (FNO; Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) in the overall cohort, in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), and cardiac-origin cardiac arrest (Cardio_CA) subgroups. Discrimination (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUROC), calibration, overall model fit (Brier score), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were assessed. For point-based CHIU scores, validation focused on observed outcome rates across predefined risk strata. Results: Among 214 patients, 79.0% (169/214) had IHCA; survival to discharge was 45.8% and FNO occurred in 24.8%. Discrimination for survival was modest across models (overall ECPR AUROC 0.608-0.709; IHCA 0.586-0.672; Cardio_CA 0.591-0.689) but was higher for FNO (overall ECPR 0.709-0.764; IHCA 0.696-0.744; Cardio_CA 0.698-0.718). The Lee model showed poor calibration with slopes far below 1, whereas RESCUE-IHCA model underestimated survival but demonstrated better calibration (slopes close to 1), higher overall accuracy (lower Brier scores) and broader clinical utility (wider net-benefit ranges in DCA). CHIU models provided limited risk separation between adjacent strata. Conclusions: In this external validation, pre-ECPR models showed modest performance, with better discrimination for neurological outcome than for survival. RESCUE-IHCA showed the most favorable overall performance. Future studies should develop and validate more robust, transportable tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resuscitation Plus
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2026.101310
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External validation of ECPR prognostic models derived from pre-ECMO indicators in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Junjie Zhao, Shujie Yan, Qiaoni Zhang, Jun Li et al.
Resuscitation Plus
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

External validation of ECPR prognostic models derived from pre-ECMO indicators in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Junjie Zhao, Shujie Yan, Qiaoni Zhang, Jun Li, Yuan Teng, Guowei Fu, Gang Liu, Xingxing Li, Chuang Liu, Yangchao Zhao, Bingyang Ji, Luyu Bian, Jian Wang, Hui Zhao
article en

Abstract

Objective: To externally validate previously published prognostic models developed exclusively from pre-extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) variables in a contemporary ECPR cohort. Methods: We conducted a bicenter retrospective external validation of four published pre-ECPR prognostic models (Lee, RESCUE-IHCA, CHIU-S1, and CHIU-S2) in adult patients treated with ECPR between January 2015 and December 2024. Model performance was evaluated for in-hospital survival and favorable neurological outcome (FNO; Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) in the overall cohort, in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), and cardiac-origin cardiac arrest (Cardio_CA) subgroups. Discrimination (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUROC), calibration, overall model fit (Brier score), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were assessed. For point-based CHIU scores, validation focused on observed outcome rates across predefined risk strata. Results: Among 214 patients, 79.0% (169/214) had IHCA; survival to discharge was 45.8% and FNO occurred in 24.8%. Discrimination for survival was modest across models (overall ECPR AUROC 0.608-0.709; IHCA 0.586-0.672; Cardio_CA 0.591-0.689) but was higher for FNO (overall ECPR 0.709-0.764; IHCA 0.696-0.744; Cardio_CA 0.698-0.718). The Lee model showed poor calibration with slopes far below 1, whereas RESCUE-IHCA model underestimated survival but demonstrated better calibration (slopes close to 1), higher overall accuracy (lower Brier scores) and broader clinical utility (wider net-benefit ranges in DCA). CHIU models provided limited risk separation between adjacent strata. Conclusions: In this external validation, pre-ECPR models showed modest performance, with better discrimination for neurological outcome than for survival. RESCUE-IHCA showed the most favorable overall performance. Future studies should develop and validate more robust, transportable tools.

Resuscitation PlusVol. 29
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN), Fu Wai Hospital (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.