Lockdown COVID‑19: a stress test revealing more about the mental health system than psychopathology—A comparative analysis between Austria, Germany, and Italy

Background: This study examined whether the COVID-19 pandemic produced diagnosis-specific and cross-nationally reproducible alterations in psychiatric admissions, or whether observed variations primarily reflected organizational responses. We compared psychiatric inpatient services from Austria and Germany-two hospital-centered systems with similar pre-pandemic structures-and used Italy as a contrasting community-based model. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study including all psychiatric hospitalizations between 2017 and 2020. Temporal admission trends were analyzed bi-weekly for each ICD-10 diagnostic group. Generalized Linear Models (Poisson family) were used to model the effects of Diagnosis, Year (2020 vs. pre-2020), Week, and Country, and their interactions. Diagnostic categories were grouped following ICD-10, with F10 (alcohol-related disorders) analyzed separately from other substance-use disorders to capture differences between planned and emergency admissions. Results: < 0.05), consistent across diagnoses except for F10. Alcohol-related disorders showed country-specific trajectories, reflecting service reorganization-bed closures in Austria versus stable capacity in Germany. No other diagnosis exhibited reproducible temporal deviations across countries, indicating that the pandemic affected admission organization rather than disorder-specific psychopathology. A supplementary comparison including Italy showed that, while Austria and Germany experienced a decline in total hospitalizations (-16 and -10%, respectively), Italy remained stable (+12%), suggesting greater resilience of its community-based system. Conclusion: The pandemic did not induce diagnosis-specific increases in acute psychiatric admissions but substantially altered their temporal organization. Differences across countries highlight how healthcare structure-particularly the integration of territorial and inpatient services-modulates system resilience under crisis conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1516371
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lockdown COVID‑19: a stress test revealing more about the mental health system than psychopathology—A comparative analysis between Austria, Germany, and Italy

Francesco de Bertoldi, Jacopo V. Bizzarri, Andreas Conca, Jan Di Pauli et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Lockdown COVID‑19: a stress test revealing more about the mental health system than psychopathology—A comparative analysis between Austria, Germany, and Italy

Francesco de Bertoldi, Jacopo V. Bizzarri, Andreas Conca, Jan Di Pauli, Davide Gaspari, Heiko Ullrich, Pascale Roux, Mariateresa Nitti, Livio Finos, Nicolas Benedetti, Johanna Neugebauer, P. Peter Plum
article en

Abstract

Background: This study examined whether the COVID-19 pandemic produced diagnosis-specific and cross-nationally reproducible alterations in psychiatric admissions, or whether observed variations primarily reflected organizational responses. We compared psychiatric inpatient services from Austria and Germany-two hospital-centered systems with similar pre-pandemic structures-and used Italy as a contrasting community-based model. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study including all psychiatric hospitalizations between 2017 and 2020. Temporal admission trends were analyzed bi-weekly for each ICD-10 diagnostic group. Generalized Linear Models (Poisson family) were used to model the effects of Diagnosis, Year (2020 vs. pre-2020), Week, and Country, and their interactions. Diagnostic categories were grouped following ICD-10, with F10 (alcohol-related disorders) analyzed separately from other substance-use disorders to capture differences between planned and emergency admissions. Results: < 0.05), consistent across diagnoses except for F10. Alcohol-related disorders showed country-specific trajectories, reflecting service reorganization-bed closures in Austria versus stable capacity in Germany. No other diagnosis exhibited reproducible temporal deviations across countries, indicating that the pandemic affected admission organization rather than disorder-specific psychopathology. A supplementary comparison including Italy showed that, while Austria and Germany experienced a decline in total hospitalizations (-16 and -10%, respectively), Italy remained stable (+12%), suggesting greater resilience of its community-based system. Conclusion: The pandemic did not induce diagnosis-specific increases in acute psychiatric admissions but substantially altered their temporal organization. Differences across countries highlight how healthcare structure-particularly the integration of territorial and inpatient services-modulates system resilience under crisis conditions.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Ospedale di Bolzano (IT), Western Regional Hospital (NP), Klinik für Psychosomatik (DE), Vorarlberg University of Applied Sciences (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.