Diagnostic test accuracy of each of the four <scp>IDEA</scp> ultrasound steps in predicting presence of deep endometriosis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic performance of each additional step of the four-step International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) consensus protocol for predicting the presence of deep endometriosis (DE) on transvaginal ultrasound. METHODS: This was an international multicenter observational cohort study of data collected prospectively between August 2018 and November 2019, with analysis performed retrospectively. Individuals with symptoms and/or signs suggestive of endometriosis were recruited from tertiary gynecological services, underwent pelvic transvaginal ultrasound assessment according to the IDEA consensus protocol and underwent laparoscopy for excision of endometriosis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios for individual and cumulative steps of the IDEA protocol in diagnosing DE were calculated with corresponding 95% CIs. Visual diagnosis at laparoscopy was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: In total, 640 participants were recruited, of whom 467 were included in the analysis. With the addition of each step of the four-step IDEA consensus protocol, the cumulative sensitivity for diagnosing DE increased progressively, from 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59-0.71) for Step 1 only to 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97) for Steps 1-4, the specificity decreased from 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84) to 0.58 (95% CI, 0.52-0.65), the accuracy increased from 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.75) to 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.81), PPV decreased from 0.78 (95% CI, 0.73-0.82) to 0.73 (95% CI, 0.70-0.76), NPV increased from 0.65 (95% CI, 0.61-0.69) to 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92), LR+ decreased from 3.02 (95% CI, 2.30-3.69) to 2.27 (95% CI, 1.93-2.67) and LR- decreased from 0.44 (95% CI, 0.37-0.53) to 0.10 (95% CI, 0.06-0.17). CONCLUSIONS: This validation study supports the use of the comprehensive four-step IDEA consensus protocol in detecting DE and justifies referral for specialist imaging in cases of suspected endometriosis. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.70208
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic test accuracy of each of the four IDEA ultrasound steps in predicting presence of deep endometriosis

C. Uzuner, Allie Eathorne, P. McClenahan, M. Espada Vaquero et al.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

Diagnostic test accuracy of each of the four IDEA ultrasound steps in predicting presence of deep endometriosis

C. Uzuner, Allie Eathorne, P. McClenahan, M. Espada Vaquero, S. Reid, J. Mak, G. Condous, IDEA Group Collaborators
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic performance of each additional step of the four-step International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) consensus protocol for predicting the presence of deep endometriosis (DE) on transvaginal ultrasound. METHODS: This was an international multicenter observational cohort study of data collected prospectively between August 2018 and November 2019, with analysis performed retrospectively. Individuals with symptoms and/or signs suggestive of endometriosis were recruited from tertiary gynecological services, underwent pelvic transvaginal ultrasound assessment according to the IDEA consensus protocol and underwent laparoscopy for excision of endometriosis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios for individual and cumulative steps of the IDEA protocol in diagnosing DE were calculated with corresponding 95% CIs. Visual diagnosis at laparoscopy was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: In total, 640 participants were recruited, of whom 467 were included in the analysis. With the addition of each step of the four-step IDEA consensus protocol, the cumulative sensitivity for diagnosing DE increased progressively, from 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59-0.71) for Step 1 only to 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97) for Steps 1-4, the specificity decreased from 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84) to 0.58 (95% CI, 0.52-0.65), the accuracy increased from 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.75) to 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.81), PPV decreased from 0.78 (95% CI, 0.73-0.82) to 0.73 (95% CI, 0.70-0.76), NPV increased from 0.65 (95% CI, 0.61-0.69) to 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92), LR+ decreased from 3.02 (95% CI, 2.30-3.69) to 2.27 (95% CI, 1.93-2.67) and LR- decreased from 0.44 (95% CI, 0.37-0.53) to 0.10 (95% CI, 0.06-0.17). CONCLUSIONS: This validation study supports the use of the comprehensive four-step IDEA consensus protocol in detecting DE and justifies referral for specialist imaging in cases of suspected endometriosis. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 67(5)
The University of Sydney (AU), Nepean Hospital (AU), Australian Federation of Graduate Women New South Wales (AU), Endometriosis UK (GB), Medical Research Institute of New Zealand (NZ), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.