Evaluation of immunotherapy response in the radiated field in patients with recurrent endometrial and cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES: Historical data suggest chemotherapy responses are poor in gynecologic cancer patients with recurrence in previously radiated fields, but the effectiveness of immunotherapy (IO) in this setting remains unclear. This study evaluated IO response and survival in patients with endometrial (EC) and cervical cancer (CC) with recurrence within or outside the radiated field. METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution cohort study was conducted in EC and CC patients treated with IO between 2017 and 2023. Patients were categorized by recurrence site: (1) within the radiated field, (2) both in and out of the radiated field, and (3) outside the radiated field. Descriptive and univariate analyses were performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined from IO initiation to progression or death, and overall survival (OS) from diagnosis to death. Kaplan-Meier methods assessed survival. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients with EC and 59 with CC were included. In EC, 12% recurred within the radiated field, 32% both in and out, and 55% outside. In CC, 20% recurred within the radiated field, 44% both in and out, and 36% outside. Complete response rates (CRR) and survival outcomes were similar across groups. For EC, CRRs were 44.4%, 20.8%, and 25.6% (p = 0.58) with median PFS of 86.5, 9.7, and 6.8 months, respectively. For CC, CRRs were 16.7%, 24%, and 10% (p = 0.31) with median PFS of 12.2, 4.6, and 3.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: IO response and survival outcomes did not differ by recurrence location relative to prior radiation fields in recurrent EC or CC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gynecologic Oncology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.03.009
Primary Topic
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of immunotherapy response in the radiated field in patients with recurrent endometrial and cervical cancer

Julia Chalif, Eric McLaughlin, Larry J. Copeland, Jessica Fulton et al.
Gynecologic Oncology
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
article

Evaluation of immunotherapy response in the radiated field in patients with recurrent endometrial and cervical cancer

Julia Chalif, Eric McLaughlin, Larry J. Copeland, Jessica Fulton, Casey M. Cosgrove, Floor Backes, Molly Morton, D. E. Cohn, Christa Irene Nagel, Jessica Sciuva, Anna Gonzalez, Laura M. Chambers, David M. O'Malley
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Historical data suggest chemotherapy responses are poor in gynecologic cancer patients with recurrence in previously radiated fields, but the effectiveness of immunotherapy (IO) in this setting remains unclear. This study evaluated IO response and survival in patients with endometrial (EC) and cervical cancer (CC) with recurrence within or outside the radiated field. METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution cohort study was conducted in EC and CC patients treated with IO between 2017 and 2023. Patients were categorized by recurrence site: (1) within the radiated field, (2) both in and out of the radiated field, and (3) outside the radiated field. Descriptive and univariate analyses were performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined from IO initiation to progression or death, and overall survival (OS) from diagnosis to death. Kaplan-Meier methods assessed survival. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients with EC and 59 with CC were included. In EC, 12% recurred within the radiated field, 32% both in and out, and 55% outside. In CC, 20% recurred within the radiated field, 44% both in and out, and 36% outside. Complete response rates (CRR) and survival outcomes were similar across groups. For EC, CRRs were 44.4%, 20.8%, and 25.6% (p = 0.58) with median PFS of 86.5, 9.7, and 6.8 months, respectively. For CC, CRRs were 16.7%, 24%, and 10% (p = 0.31) with median PFS of 12.2, 4.6, and 3.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: IO response and survival outcomes did not differ by recurrence location relative to prior radiation fields in recurrent EC or CC.

Gynecologic OncologyVol. 208
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US), The Ohio State University (US)
National Institutes of Health, Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.