Measuring health-related quality of life in infants and toddlers: conceptual challenges and proposed recommendations

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the very young (i.e., infants and toddlers, aged 0–47 months) presents unique conceptual and methodological challenges. As infants and toddlers cannot reliably self-report their HRQoL, observer inference is necessary. This raises questions about which concepts should be included; how to manage proxy reporting; and how to capture genuine variations in HRQoL, not changes in development or assessment. This commentary outlines six key challenges in measuring infant and toddler HRQoL and details eight proposed recommendations for HRQoL researchers. The piece draws on insights from the EuroQol Toddler and Infant Populations (EQ-TIPS) project, aimed to develop a generic preference-weighted measure (PWM) of HRQoL for infants and children, but has broader applicability to HRQoL measurement in the very young. Key issues addressed include: (i) what concepts to measure; (ii) how to identify which concepts matter to very young children; (iii) managing proxy reporting and reducing bias; (iv) accounting for rapid developmental changes; (v) managing continuity across life-course instruments; and (vi) separating child HRQoL from family spillover effects. Proposed recommendations include greater consensus on a core HRQoL model; prioritising primary caregiver perspectives; justifying and operationalising observable aspects of subjective HRQoL; careful design to capture genuine HRQoL, not developmental change or caregiver spillover; and developing measurement systems to prioritise age-based sensitivity or comparability across time. These recommendations offer a foundation for future consensus-building and research to refine and harmonise best practices in infant and toddler HRQoL measurement, particularly for use in health technology assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality of Life Research
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-026-04199-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring health-related quality of life in infants and toddlers: conceptual challenges and proposed recommendations

J. Carlton, Janine Verstraete, Tessa Peasgood, Philip A. Powell et al.
1 citations
Quality of Life Research
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
29.43
article

Measuring health-related quality of life in infants and toddlers: conceptual challenges and proposed recommendations

J. Carlton, Janine Verstraete, Tessa Peasgood, Philip A. Powell, Mike Herdman, Simone Schieskow, Fanni Rencz, Brendan Mulhern, Aureliano Finch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the very young (i.e., infants and toddlers, aged 0–47 months) presents unique conceptual and methodological challenges. As infants and toddlers cannot reliably self-report their HRQoL, observer inference is necessary. This raises questions about which concepts should be included; how to manage proxy reporting; and how to capture genuine variations in HRQoL, not changes in development or assessment. This commentary outlines six key challenges in measuring infant and toddler HRQoL and details eight proposed recommendations for HRQoL researchers. The piece draws on insights from the EuroQol Toddler and Infant Populations (EQ-TIPS) project, aimed to develop a generic preference-weighted measure (PWM) of HRQoL for infants and children, but has broader applicability to HRQoL measurement in the very young. Key issues addressed include: (i) what concepts to measure; (ii) how to identify which concepts matter to very young children; (iii) managing proxy reporting and reducing bias; (iv) accounting for rapid developmental changes; (v) managing continuity across life-course instruments; and (vi) separating child HRQoL from family spillover effects. Proposed recommendations include greater consensus on a core HRQoL model; prioritising primary caregiver perspectives; justifying and operationalising observable aspects of subjective HRQoL; careful design to capture genuine HRQoL, not developmental change or caregiver spillover; and developing measurement systems to prioritise age-based sensitivity or comparability across time. These recommendations offer a foundation for future consensus-building and research to refine and harmonise best practices in infant and toddler HRQoL measurement, particularly for use in health technology assessment.

Quality of Life ResearchVol. 35(5)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), University of Cape Town (ZA), Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), National University of Singapore (SG), Bielefeld University (DE), EuroQol Research Foundation (NL), National University Health System (SG), University of Sheffield (GB)
EuroQol Research Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
29.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.