Risk Level Assessment and Impact Range Analysis of CCUS CO2 Pipeline Leakage Based on Machine Learning

In emergency decision-making for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) CO2 pipeline leakage, risk levels and warning distances/impact ranges are often derived from different methodological systems—risk-matrix scoring versus mechanistic consequence modeling. Differences in threshold definitions and modeling assumptions make it difficult to align level assignment with distance boundaries for the same scenario, which in turn reduces the comparability and traceability of multi-scenario batch screening. To address this, this study proposes an integrated framework based on “threshold impact-distance calculation–risk-matrix mapping,” with physical consequence quantification as the main thread. A scenario library (N = 4320) covering phase state, leak aperture, operating conditions, and meteorological fields is constructed; impact distances corresponding to CO2 volume-fraction thresholds of 1%/4%/10% (R1%, R4%, R10%) are computed and then mapped to five RiskLevel classes under a unified rule set, enabling standardized synchronous outputs. The modeling tasks are formulated as RiskLevel classification and threshold-distance regression. Using a stratified 70%/30% train–test split, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) is adopted as the primary model and compared with logistic regression (LR), support vector classification (SVC), ordinary least squares regression (OLS), and support vector regression (SVR). Results show that XGBoost achieves an accuracy of 0.806 and a macro-F1 of 0.825 for RiskLevel classification, with a recall of 0.631 for the high-risk classes (RiskLevel 4–5), and yields mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 95/62/41 m for R1%/R4%/R10% regression with coefficient of determination (R2) values of 0.795–0.814. Distributional analysis further indicates that threshold impact distances increase overall with higher RiskLevel, while dispersion becomes larger at higher levels. Accordingly, a parallel representation of “RiskLevel + multi-threshold rings” is recommended to support coordinated graded control and zoned warning delineation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/safety12020044
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Level Assessment and Impact Range Analysis of CCUS CO2 Pipeline Leakage Based on Machine Learning

Fang Wang, Shuna Wang, Haoyuan Zhang, Xiaoping Jia
Safety
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Risk Level Assessment and Impact Range Analysis of CCUS CO2 Pipeline Leakage Based on Machine Learning

Fang Wang, Shuna Wang, Haoyuan Zhang, Xiaoping Jia
article en

Abstract

In emergency decision-making for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) CO2 pipeline leakage, risk levels and warning distances/impact ranges are often derived from different methodological systems—risk-matrix scoring versus mechanistic consequence modeling. Differences in threshold definitions and modeling assumptions make it difficult to align level assignment with distance boundaries for the same scenario, which in turn reduces the comparability and traceability of multi-scenario batch screening. To address this, this study proposes an integrated framework based on “threshold impact-distance calculation–risk-matrix mapping,” with physical consequence quantification as the main thread. A scenario library (N = 4320) covering phase state, leak aperture, operating conditions, and meteorological fields is constructed; impact distances corresponding to CO2 volume-fraction thresholds of 1%/4%/10% (R1%, R4%, R10%) are computed and then mapped to five RiskLevel classes under a unified rule set, enabling standardized synchronous outputs. The modeling tasks are formulated as RiskLevel classification and threshold-distance regression. Using a stratified 70%/30% train–test split, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) is adopted as the primary model and compared with logistic regression (LR), support vector classification (SVC), ordinary least squares regression (OLS), and support vector regression (SVR). Results show that XGBoost achieves an accuracy of 0.806 and a macro-F1 of 0.825 for RiskLevel classification, with a recall of 0.631 for the high-risk classes (RiskLevel 4–5), and yields mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 95/62/41 m for R1%/R4%/R10% regression with coefficient of determination (R2) values of 0.795–0.814. Distributional analysis further indicates that threshold impact distances increase overall with higher RiskLevel, while dispersion becomes larger at higher levels. Accordingly, a parallel representation of “RiskLevel + multi-threshold rings” is recommended to support coordinated graded control and zoned warning delineation.

SafetyVol. 12(2)
Qingdao University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.