Study on the Influence of Protector Design on the Biomechanical Characteristics of Knee Joint Movement

= 5) examined how knee joint protector design modulates knee biomechanics across walking, jogging, squatting, and sit-to-stand tasks using optical motion capture and AnyBody musculoskeletal modeling (FullBody_GRFPrediction). We quantified knee flexion kinematics, model-estimated joint reaction forces and moments, and model-estimated muscle activity of eight lower-limb muscles under four conditions with different levels of structural constraint: no protector (Pro.off), a conventional sleeve-type protector (Pro.a), a segmented support protector (Pro.b), and a wrapping fixation protector (Pro.c). The biomechanical protective performance of the knee joint protector was task- and phase-dependent. The results showed that Pro.a optimized muscle activation. Pro.b increased sagittal-plane design but increased joint loading and muscle activity. Pro.c induced noticeable distal compensation along the kinetic chain. The findings revealed that protector effects were task-dependent. Dynamic tasks mainly affected coronal-plane stability parameters, whereas quasi-static tasks more clearly altered sagittal load distribution. In this study, biomechanical protective performance is defined as reduced knee joint loading without disproportionate increases in model-estimated muscle activity or excessive loss of functional knee flexion range. Under this definition, greater structural constraint did not consistently produce a more favorable biomechanical profile. These results provide a feasibility baseline for task-specific protector evaluation and motivate confirmatory studies with larger cohorts and experimental validation. This study provides theoretical and methodological insights to guide future design and optimization of knee joint protectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26072168
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the Influence of Protector Design on the Biomechanical Characteristics of Knee Joint Movement

Xinran Cheng, Jiaxin Zhao, Lingxiao Xi, Yongwei Li et al.
Sensors
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Study on the Influence of Protector Design on the Biomechanical Characteristics of Knee Joint Movement

Xinran Cheng, Jiaxin Zhao, Lingxiao Xi, Yongwei Li, Jihyun Bae
article en

Abstract

= 5) examined how knee joint protector design modulates knee biomechanics across walking, jogging, squatting, and sit-to-stand tasks using optical motion capture and AnyBody musculoskeletal modeling (FullBody_GRFPrediction). We quantified knee flexion kinematics, model-estimated joint reaction forces and moments, and model-estimated muscle activity of eight lower-limb muscles under four conditions with different levels of structural constraint: no protector (Pro.off), a conventional sleeve-type protector (Pro.a), a segmented support protector (Pro.b), and a wrapping fixation protector (Pro.c). The biomechanical protective performance of the knee joint protector was task- and phase-dependent. The results showed that Pro.a optimized muscle activation. Pro.b increased sagittal-plane design but increased joint loading and muscle activity. Pro.c induced noticeable distal compensation along the kinetic chain. The findings revealed that protector effects were task-dependent. Dynamic tasks mainly affected coronal-plane stability parameters, whereas quasi-static tasks more clearly altered sagittal load distribution. In this study, biomechanical protective performance is defined as reduced knee joint loading without disproportionate increases in model-estimated muscle activity or excessive loss of functional knee flexion range. Under this definition, greater structural constraint did not consistently produce a more favorable biomechanical profile. These results provide a feasibility baseline for task-specific protector evaluation and motivate confirmatory studies with larger cohorts and experimental validation. This study provides theoretical and methodological insights to guide future design and optimization of knee joint protectors.

SensorsVol. 26(7)
Xi’an University (CN), Xi'an University of Technology (CN), Hanyang University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.