Inconsistent Responding on a Mixed-Worded Scale in the PISA 2022 Questionnaire: Prevalence and Predictors Across Seven Countries

Mixed-worded questionnaire scales, containing both positively and negatively phrased items, are intended to encourage thoughtful responses, but may result in inconsistent responses and wording effects and can reduce reliability and validity. This study examined the prevalence and predictors of inconsistent responding to a mixed-worded scale in the 2022 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) across seven countries. Using factor mixture analysis, findings revealed a low but variable rate of inconsistency (2–8%) across countries. Separate confirmatory factor analysis models on the effective and on filtered samples of consistent respondents showed improved fit and reliability indices for the filtered samples for all countries, suggesting that inconsistent respondents had unexpected response patterns. In logistic regression models, inconsistent responding was associated with lower PISA reading scores and often with reduced self-reported effort, suggesting that inconsistent responses may stem from lower reading ability and/or carelessness. The results contribute to ongoing discussions about the use of mixed wording in questionnaires and highlight the need to account for respondent behavior when analyzing survey data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829261440806
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inconsistent Responding on a Mixed-Worded Scale in the PISA 2022 Questionnaire: Prevalence and Predictors Across Seven Countries

Isa Steinmann, Michalis P. Michaelides, Militsa Ivanova, Evi Konstantinidou
1 citations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
44.04
article

Inconsistent Responding on a Mixed-Worded Scale in the PISA 2022 Questionnaire: Prevalence and Predictors Across Seven Countries

Isa Steinmann, Michalis P. Michaelides, Militsa Ivanova, Evi Konstantinidou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Mixed-worded questionnaire scales, containing both positively and negatively phrased items, are intended to encourage thoughtful responses, but may result in inconsistent responses and wording effects and can reduce reliability and validity. This study examined the prevalence and predictors of inconsistent responding to a mixed-worded scale in the 2022 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) across seven countries. Using factor mixture analysis, findings revealed a low but variable rate of inconsistency (2–8%) across countries. Separate confirmatory factor analysis models on the effective and on filtered samples of consistent respondents showed improved fit and reliability indices for the filtered samples for all countries, suggesting that inconsistent respondents had unexpected response patterns. In logistic regression models, inconsistent responding was associated with lower PISA reading scores and often with reduced self-reported effort, suggesting that inconsistent responses may stem from lower reading ability and/or carelessness. The results contribute to ongoing discussions about the use of mixed wording in questionnaires and highlight the need to account for respondent behavior when analyzing survey data.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
University of Nicosia (CY), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Cyprus (CY)
University of Cyprus
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
44.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.