Compartmental Modeling of Woodland Ecosystem Services for Evaluating Urban Natural Capital in Sustainable Cities

ABSTRACT Ecosystem services (ES) from natural assets such as woodlands, freshwater, and air are vital for human well‐being and economic sustainability. In the UK, ES contribute approximately £1.5 trillion annually, with woodland ecosystem services (WES) alone valued at £382 billion. Key WES include carbon capture, air and water purification, recreation, and urban health services. Despite their significance, urban ES management often lacks comprehensive computational models for effective accounting and resource planning. When developed, sustainable smart city governance technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and predictive analytics can be integrated to enhance the forecasting and valuation of ES for natural capital accounting. In addition, other frameworks such as game theory, Leontief Input–Output analysis, gene–environment networks, and homogenization theory can be explored. This study models WES components as compartments using ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and incorporates management practices, such as forest conservation (e.g., reforestation), recreational infrastructure conservation (e.g., site hardening, visitor management), and water conservation (e.g., habitat protection, species management), as control variables. Since the resulting model is nonlinear and analytical solutions do not exist, we apply the widely used and complementary numerical methods, Non‐Standard Finite Difference (NFSD) and Runge–Kutta 4th Order (RK4), to approximate solutions of such ODE problems, thereby preserving accuracy, stability, and nonnegativity. The NSFD and RK4 are applied to assess three critical WES: carbon sequestration, recreational infrastructure, and water filtration. The NSFD method is suited for global, long‐term analyses and achieved up to 55.68% effectiveness, while RK4 is more appropriate for short‐term, detailed dynamics and attained 48.66% effectiveness. These results highlight that compartmental modeling with either method can accurately capture ecosystem services for smart city planning and valuation. Both approaches are robust, with control variables such as reforestation enhancing carbon capture, improving water quality, and promoting urban health. This study emphasizes the importance of integrated governance frameworks that combine reforestation, conservation, and smart infrastructure policies to support long‐term urban sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Reports
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70732
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compartmental Modeling of Woodland Ecosystem Services for Evaluating Urban Natural Capital in Sustainable Cities

Kelvin Anoh, Titus Ifeanyi Chinebu, Simeon Keates, Kennedy Chinedu Okafor et al.
Engineering Reports
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Compartmental Modeling of Woodland Ecosystem Services for Evaluating Urban Natural Capital in Sustainable Cities

Kelvin Anoh, Titus Ifeanyi Chinebu, Simeon Keates, Kennedy Chinedu Okafor, Omowunmi Mary Longe
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ecosystem services (ES) from natural assets such as woodlands, freshwater, and air are vital for human well‐being and economic sustainability. In the UK, ES contribute approximately £1.5 trillion annually, with woodland ecosystem services (WES) alone valued at £382 billion. Key WES include carbon capture, air and water purification, recreation, and urban health services. Despite their significance, urban ES management often lacks comprehensive computational models for effective accounting and resource planning. When developed, sustainable smart city governance technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and predictive analytics can be integrated to enhance the forecasting and valuation of ES for natural capital accounting. In addition, other frameworks such as game theory, Leontief Input–Output analysis, gene–environment networks, and homogenization theory can be explored. This study models WES components as compartments using ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and incorporates management practices, such as forest conservation (e.g., reforestation), recreational infrastructure conservation (e.g., site hardening, visitor management), and water conservation (e.g., habitat protection, species management), as control variables. Since the resulting model is nonlinear and analytical solutions do not exist, we apply the widely used and complementary numerical methods, Non‐Standard Finite Difference (NFSD) and Runge–Kutta 4th Order (RK4), to approximate solutions of such ODE problems, thereby preserving accuracy, stability, and nonnegativity. The NSFD and RK4 are applied to assess three critical WES: carbon sequestration, recreational infrastructure, and water filtration. The NSFD method is suited for global, long‐term analyses and achieved up to 55.68% effectiveness, while RK4 is more appropriate for short‐term, detailed dynamics and attained 48.66% effectiveness. These results highlight that compartmental modeling with either method can accurately capture ecosystem services for smart city planning and valuation. Both approaches are robust, with control variables such as reforestation enhancing carbon capture, improving water quality, and promoting urban health. This study emphasizes the importance of integrated governance frameworks that combine reforestation, conservation, and smart infrastructure policies to support long‐term urban sustainability.

Engineering ReportsVol. 8(4)
University of Chichester (GB), University of Nigeria (NG), Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Imperial College London (GB)
Texas Emerging Technology Fund, Manchester Metropolitan University, Tertiary Education Trust Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.