The Effect of Initial Accuracy on the Learning and Retention of Novel Words

During word learning, incorrect guesses about meaning are inevitable, particularly in difficult learning situations. Prior research has shown that optimally difficult tasks improve word learning and retention, but found no item-level effects of first-guess inaccuracy on learning, raising the question of how difficulty and guessing accuracy interact in this process. Effects of first-guess accuracy on retention are unknown. To unpack the effects of task difficulty and first-guess accuracy on word learning and retention, we conducted two cross-situational word-learning (CSWL) studies. In Study 1, 49 English-speaking adults completed a difficult CSWL task with four items presented on each trial. Their word learning was tested immediately following the learning phase and then again 48 h later. Data were analyzed with respect to the accuracy of the first guess of a word's meaning. Participants in this study learned and retained words best when their first guess had been correct. Study 2 simplified learning, presenting three items per trial. Fifty-two English-speaking participants showed high levels of learning and retention, with no significant differences based on first-guess accuracy. Comparing data across these studies revealed effects of both task difficulty and first-guess accuracy on learning, as well as an interaction of these factors, revealing a greater cost to inaccurate first guesses on the more difficult task. Retention of word meanings, however, was associated only with task difficulty. These results have implications for theories of error-driven versus difficulty-driven learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Science
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70201
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Initial Accuracy on the Learning and Retention of Novel Words

Allyson Kuznia, Erin Conwell
Cognitive Science
Reading and Literacy Development
article

The Effect of Initial Accuracy on the Learning and Retention of Novel Words

Allyson Kuznia, Erin Conwell
article en

Abstract

During word learning, incorrect guesses about meaning are inevitable, particularly in difficult learning situations. Prior research has shown that optimally difficult tasks improve word learning and retention, but found no item-level effects of first-guess inaccuracy on learning, raising the question of how difficulty and guessing accuracy interact in this process. Effects of first-guess accuracy on retention are unknown. To unpack the effects of task difficulty and first-guess accuracy on word learning and retention, we conducted two cross-situational word-learning (CSWL) studies. In Study 1, 49 English-speaking adults completed a difficult CSWL task with four items presented on each trial. Their word learning was tested immediately following the learning phase and then again 48 h later. Data were analyzed with respect to the accuracy of the first guess of a word's meaning. Participants in this study learned and retained words best when their first guess had been correct. Study 2 simplified learning, presenting three items per trial. Fifty-two English-speaking participants showed high levels of learning and retention, with no significant differences based on first-guess accuracy. Comparing data across these studies revealed effects of both task difficulty and first-guess accuracy on learning, as well as an interaction of these factors, revealing a greater cost to inaccurate first guesses on the more difficult task. Retention of word meanings, however, was associated only with task difficulty. These results have implications for theories of error-driven versus difficulty-driven learning.

Cognitive ScienceVol. 50(4)
Dakota State University (US), University of Oregon (US), North Dakota State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.