Risk-stratified surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with most cases arising in patients with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B. Current guidelines recommend semi-annual ultrasound with or without alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing for all at-risk individuals; however, this one-size-fits-all approach has important limitations, including suboptimal sensitivity, frequent false-positive results, poor adherence, and failure to account for substantial heterogeneity in individual HCC risk. Risk-stratified surveillance has emerged as a potential strategy to better balance surveillance benefits and harms by tailoring surveillance intensity and modality to patient-specific risk. We summarize and critically evaluate existing HCC risk stratification models, including clinical, biomarker-based, and imaging-based or elastography-based approaches. Although several models demonstrate promising performance, many lack robust external validation, underrepresent patients with metabolic and alcohol-associated liver disease, and inadequately account for competing risks such as non-liver-related mortality. We further discuss key challenges to implementing risk-stratified surveillance in clinical practice. Overall, while risk-stratified HCC surveillance has several promising characteristics over current paradigms, prospective validation and implementation studies are needed before widespread adoption. Aligning surveillance strategies with individualized risk has the potential to improve outcomes in patients at risk for HCC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hepatology Communications
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/hc9.0000000000000943
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk-stratified surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma

Neehar D. Parikh, Thomas Hunold
Hepatology Communications
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Risk-stratified surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma

Neehar D. Parikh, Thomas Hunold
article en

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with most cases arising in patients with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B. Current guidelines recommend semi-annual ultrasound with or without alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing for all at-risk individuals; however, this one-size-fits-all approach has important limitations, including suboptimal sensitivity, frequent false-positive results, poor adherence, and failure to account for substantial heterogeneity in individual HCC risk. Risk-stratified surveillance has emerged as a potential strategy to better balance surveillance benefits and harms by tailoring surveillance intensity and modality to patient-specific risk. We summarize and critically evaluate existing HCC risk stratification models, including clinical, biomarker-based, and imaging-based or elastography-based approaches. Although several models demonstrate promising performance, many lack robust external validation, underrepresent patients with metabolic and alcohol-associated liver disease, and inadequately account for competing risks such as non-liver-related mortality. We further discuss key challenges to implementing risk-stratified surveillance in clinical practice. Overall, while risk-stratified HCC surveillance has several promising characteristics over current paradigms, prospective validation and implementation studies are needed before widespread adoption. Aligning surveillance strategies with individualized risk has the potential to improve outcomes in patients at risk for HCC.

Hepatology CommunicationsVol. 10(4)
University of Michigan (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.