Two-Stage Reconstruction of Large and Ptotic Breasts in Patients Undergoing Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: A Single Center Experience Using Autologous Tissue

In this study, we present cases of patients with large, ptotic breasts who underwent a two-stage reconstruction using a Wise-pattern reduction followed by mastectomy and autologous reconstruction. The aim of this study is to report our experience with a two-stage approach to risk-reducing mastectomy for ptotic breasts. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent two-stage breast reconstruction between August 2019 and September 2023 at our institution. We included patients with large, ptotic breasts and excluded those who had undergone a previous cosmetic breast reduction and those lost to follow-up. We collected and analyzed data on patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes using descriptive statistics. A total of 61 patients underwent risk-reducing mastectomies, with five patients (8.19%) undergoing a two-stage reconstructive approach. The mean age of the study patients was 41.6 years, and they had an average body mass index of 29.16 kg/m2. All patients underwent a nipple-sacrificing mastectomy. Three patients received deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps, two received L-shaped upper gracilis (LUG) flaps, and one patient with a history of abdominal surgery underwent a LUG flap reconstruction. The average postoperative length of stay was 1.25 days following reduction and 2.8 days following reconstruction. The amount of tissue excised averaged 498.25 g for the right and 561.75 g for the left breast. The flap survival rate was 100%, with minimal complications. The results of our study emphasize the efficacy of our approach. We suggest additional comparative studies to refine the timing and techniques for optimal results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic and Aesthetic Nursing
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/psn.0000000000000639
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-Stage Reconstruction of Large and Ptotic Breasts in Patients Undergoing Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: A Single Center Experience Using Autologous Tissue

Georgios Kyrtsonis, Dimitrios Papadopoulos, Ahmed Hagiga, Adam Blackburn et al.
Plastic and Aesthetic Nursing
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Two-Stage Reconstruction of Large and Ptotic Breasts in Patients Undergoing Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: A Single Center Experience Using Autologous Tissue

Georgios Kyrtsonis, Dimitrios Papadopoulos, Ahmed Hagiga, Adam Blackburn, Murtaza Kadhum, Katia Sindali
article en

Abstract

In this study, we present cases of patients with large, ptotic breasts who underwent a two-stage reconstruction using a Wise-pattern reduction followed by mastectomy and autologous reconstruction. The aim of this study is to report our experience with a two-stage approach to risk-reducing mastectomy for ptotic breasts. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent two-stage breast reconstruction between August 2019 and September 2023 at our institution. We included patients with large, ptotic breasts and excluded those who had undergone a previous cosmetic breast reduction and those lost to follow-up. We collected and analyzed data on patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes using descriptive statistics. A total of 61 patients underwent risk-reducing mastectomies, with five patients (8.19%) undergoing a two-stage reconstructive approach. The mean age of the study patients was 41.6 years, and they had an average body mass index of 29.16 kg/m2. All patients underwent a nipple-sacrificing mastectomy. Three patients received deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps, two received L-shaped upper gracilis (LUG) flaps, and one patient with a history of abdominal surgery underwent a LUG flap reconstruction. The average postoperative length of stay was 1.25 days following reduction and 2.8 days following reconstruction. The amount of tissue excised averaged 498.25 g for the right and 561.75 g for the left breast. The flap survival rate was 100%, with minimal complications. The results of our study emphasize the efficacy of our approach. We suggest additional comparative studies to refine the timing and techniques for optimal results.

Plastic and Aesthetic NursingVol. 46(2)
Queen Victoria Hospital (GB), Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.