Application and Internal Validation of the Modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score for Early Triage of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding requires early risk stratification to identify patients who may need urgent intervention while avoiding unnecessary hospitalization among low-risk cases. This retrospective single-center cohort study evaluated the modified Glasgow-Blatchford score as an objective triage tool in comparison with the original Glasgow-Blatchford score. A total of 366 consecutive patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding were included. Clinical presentation, initial vital signs, and the earliest laboratory results obtained at presentation were used to calculate both scores. The primary high-risk outcome was a composite of in-hospital blood transfusion, therapeutic endoscopy, surgery, or death. Using a predefined low-risk threshold of ≤1, diagnostic performance was evaluated overall and in variceal and non-variceal subgroups. Overall, 151 of 366 patients (41.26%) met the composite high-risk outcome, and 18 patients (4.92%) died during hospitalization. At the predefined threshold, the modified score showed higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and agreement than the original score, with the greatest gains observed in specificity (45.58% vs. 40.00%) and negative predictive value (98.00% vs. 94.51%). The modified score classified 9 additional patients as low risk and reduced false-negative low-risk classifications from 5 cases to 2 cases. Specificity was also higher in both bleeding-etiology subgroups. Mortality discrimination was more favorable for the modified score, although this finding should be interpreted cautiously because only 18 deaths occurred. These findings suggest that the modified Glasgow-Blatchford score may support a more standardized objective approach to early triage, but the remaining false-negative cases indicate that it should be used as an adjunct to clinical assessment rather than as a stand-alone discharge tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3791/70836
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application and Internal Validation of the Modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score for Early Triage of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Yufang Liu, Jinyang Li, Xiang Liu, Wujian He
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Application and Internal Validation of the Modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score for Early Triage of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Yufang Liu, Jinyang Li, Xiang Liu, Wujian He
article en

Abstract

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding requires early risk stratification to identify patients who may need urgent intervention while avoiding unnecessary hospitalization among low-risk cases. This retrospective single-center cohort study evaluated the modified Glasgow-Blatchford score as an objective triage tool in comparison with the original Glasgow-Blatchford score. A total of 366 consecutive patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding were included. Clinical presentation, initial vital signs, and the earliest laboratory results obtained at presentation were used to calculate both scores. The primary high-risk outcome was a composite of in-hospital blood transfusion, therapeutic endoscopy, surgery, or death. Using a predefined low-risk threshold of ≤1, diagnostic performance was evaluated overall and in variceal and non-variceal subgroups. Overall, 151 of 366 patients (41.26%) met the composite high-risk outcome, and 18 patients (4.92%) died during hospitalization. At the predefined threshold, the modified score showed higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and agreement than the original score, with the greatest gains observed in specificity (45.58% vs. 40.00%) and negative predictive value (98.00% vs. 94.51%). The modified score classified 9 additional patients as low risk and reduced false-negative low-risk classifications from 5 cases to 2 cases. Specificity was also higher in both bleeding-etiology subgroups. Mortality discrimination was more favorable for the modified score, although this finding should be interpreted cautiously because only 18 deaths occurred. These findings suggest that the modified Glasgow-Blatchford score may support a more standardized objective approach to early triage, but the remaining false-negative cases indicate that it should be used as an adjunct to clinical assessment rather than as a stand-alone discharge tool.

Journal of Visualized Experiments(235)
Qinghai University (CN), Qinghai Red Cross Hospital (CN), Qinghai Provincial Peoples Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.