The Three-Tier Open-Reason Test: Analyzing Misconceptions and Obstacles Students through Individual-Centered Written Verbal Representations on Physics Concept

This study investigates students’ conceptions of the free-fall motion concept. The three-tier open-reason test was used as an instrument to diagnose students’ conceptual understanding. A total of 20 high school students (10 males and 10 females) participated in this study. The analysis focused on individual-centered verbal written representations to uncover students’ understanding, misconceptions (MCs), and the reasoning behind their answers. The results indicate that the most dominant MCs is the belief that gravity does not act in a vacuum. While some students demonstrated partial or sound understanding, many provided guessing or non-scientific answers. Rasch analysis was employed to measure individual student abilities and map item difficulty, enabling the identification of students who require targeted interventions. These findings highlight the importance of addressing specific MCs and applying tailored instructional approaches to enhance conceptual understanding in physics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science education international
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v37.i1.8
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Three-Tier Open-Reason Test: Analyzing Misconceptions and Obstacles Students through Individual-Centered Written Verbal Representations on Physics Concept

Kristóf Fenyvesi, Mohd Zaidi Bin Amiruddin, Achmad Samsudin, Bayram Costu et al.
Science education international
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

The Three-Tier Open-Reason Test: Analyzing Misconceptions and Obstacles Students through Individual-Centered Written Verbal Representations on Physics Concept

Kristóf Fenyvesi, Mohd Zaidi Bin Amiruddin, Achmad Samsudin, Bayram Costu, Andi Suhandi
article en

Abstract

This study investigates students’ conceptions of the free-fall motion concept. The three-tier open-reason test was used as an instrument to diagnose students’ conceptual understanding. A total of 20 high school students (10 males and 10 females) participated in this study. The analysis focused on individual-centered verbal written representations to uncover students’ understanding, misconceptions (MCs), and the reasoning behind their answers. The results indicate that the most dominant MCs is the belief that gravity does not act in a vacuum. While some students demonstrated partial or sound understanding, many provided guessing or non-scientific answers. Rasch analysis was employed to measure individual student abilities and map item difficulty, enabling the identification of students who require targeted interventions. These findings highlight the importance of addressing specific MCs and applying tailored instructional approaches to enhance conceptual understanding in physics.

Science education internationalVol. 37(1)
Indonesia University of Education (ID), Yıldız Technical University (TR), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.