A systematic review of the implementation of cancer-specific holistic needs assessment (HNA) in adult clinical practice, and applicability to the brain tumour population

PURPOSE: This review aimed to identify and review any brain tumour-specific holistic needs assessment (HNA) and the clinical implementation of any HNAs in an adult cancer population. METHODS: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Five electronic databases were searched from 2008 to 2023 and updated in January 2025. Reference lists of systematic reviews were screened for relevant studies. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction. RESULTS: Four HNA tools implemented in clinical practice, across 9 studies, were included. One study was adapted for brain tumour patients. Evidence of widespread implementation in clinical practice was limited and varied evidence, relating to the timing, location and mode of delivering. Patients were more likely to report on physical rather than psychosocial needs, with limited evidence of patient and staff satisfaction with the use of HNA. CONCLUSION: There is limited and varied evidence of HNAs being successfully implemented in brain tumour and the wider cancer healthcare settings. Tailored interventions for the needs of people with brain tumour have the potential to address the complexities this population faces. However, clear evidence-based guidance to develop relevant HNAs for successful implementation in clinical settings is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10609-x
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of the implementation of cancer-specific holistic needs assessment (HNA) in adult clinical practice, and applicability to the brain tumour population

Mala Mann, Helen Bulbeck, Ameeta Retzer, Elin Baddeley et al.
Supportive Care in Cancer
Cancer survivorship and care
article

A systematic review of the implementation of cancer-specific holistic needs assessment (HNA) in adult clinical practice, and applicability to the brain tumour population

Mala Mann, Helen Bulbeck, Ameeta Retzer, Elin Baddeley, Kathy Seddon, Stephanie Sivell, Anthony Byrne, †Timothy Hamilton
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This review aimed to identify and review any brain tumour-specific holistic needs assessment (HNA) and the clinical implementation of any HNAs in an adult cancer population. METHODS: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Five electronic databases were searched from 2008 to 2023 and updated in January 2025. Reference lists of systematic reviews were screened for relevant studies. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction. RESULTS: Four HNA tools implemented in clinical practice, across 9 studies, were included. One study was adapted for brain tumour patients. Evidence of widespread implementation in clinical practice was limited and varied evidence, relating to the timing, location and mode of delivering. Patients were more likely to report on physical rather than psychosocial needs, with limited evidence of patient and staff satisfaction with the use of HNA. CONCLUSION: There is limited and varied evidence of HNAs being successfully implemented in brain tumour and the wider cancer healthcare settings. Tailored interventions for the needs of people with brain tumour have the potential to address the complexities this population faces. However, clear evidence-based guidance to develop relevant HNAs for successful implementation in clinical settings is needed.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(4)
Velindre NHS Trust (GB), Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (GB), Brain Tumour Charity (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), Marie Curie Hospice (GB), Velindre Cancer Centre (GB), NIHR Research Delivery Network (GB), NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Cardiff University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.