Maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality in OECD countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic inequalities in neonatal mortality are observed globally but gaps remain in the evidence from current reviews, specifically: a wider range of socioeconomic indicators at the individual, household and area level than previous reviews, and alternative time frames to define neonatal mortality. Thus, a comprehensive updated review of the literature is required, focusing on multiple measures of socioeconomic status and alternative time frames, to assess the relationship between maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality in high-income countries. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Three different search approaches will be used: electronic searching of three databases, grey literature searching and reference list checking. First, the three databases Medline, Scopus and Web of Science will be searched using relevant synonyms and adapted terms from medical subject heading terms (MeSH) in Medline for maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality identified from previous systematic reviews on inequalities in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Second, grey literature will be searched by entering the relevant terms into Google. Title, abstract and full text screening will be conducted by the review team against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with at least 10% checked by a second reviewer to assess for any bias and errors. We will also conduct the kappa statistic for inter-rater reliability. Third, the reference lists of included studies will be reviewed for any additional studies that meet the criteria. Data will be extracted using a data extraction form and extracted studies will be assessed using the Liverpool Quality Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis will be conducted and, where appropriate, meta-analysis will be performed. If the data allow, subgroup analysis by neonatal care population and specific gestational ages will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as all studies in this systematic review will be publicly available. The findings of this review will be presented at conferences and disseminated in peer-reviewed publications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022315407.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106492
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality in OECD countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Michelle Maden, Oluwaseun B Esan, Gillian Maudsley, Daniela K Schlüter et al.
BMJ Open
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality in OECD countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Michelle Maden, Oluwaseun B Esan, Gillian Maudsley, Daniela K Schlüter, Ian Sinha, Natalie Gallagher, Samira Saberian, Nim Subhedar, Sandra Djoumessi Tonle, David Taylor-Robinson, Michael Madden
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic inequalities in neonatal mortality are observed globally but gaps remain in the evidence from current reviews, specifically: a wider range of socioeconomic indicators at the individual, household and area level than previous reviews, and alternative time frames to define neonatal mortality. Thus, a comprehensive updated review of the literature is required, focusing on multiple measures of socioeconomic status and alternative time frames, to assess the relationship between maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality in high-income countries. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Three different search approaches will be used: electronic searching of three databases, grey literature searching and reference list checking. First, the three databases Medline, Scopus and Web of Science will be searched using relevant synonyms and adapted terms from medical subject heading terms (MeSH) in Medline for maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality identified from previous systematic reviews on inequalities in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Second, grey literature will be searched by entering the relevant terms into Google. Title, abstract and full text screening will be conducted by the review team against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with at least 10% checked by a second reviewer to assess for any bias and errors. We will also conduct the kappa statistic for inter-rater reliability. Third, the reference lists of included studies will be reviewed for any additional studies that meet the criteria. Data will be extracted using a data extraction form and extracted studies will be assessed using the Liverpool Quality Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis will be conducted and, where appropriate, meta-analysis will be performed. If the data allow, subgroup analysis by neonatal care population and specific gestational ages will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as all studies in this systematic review will be publicly available. The findings of this review will be presented at conferences and disseminated in peer-reviewed publications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022315407.

BMJ OpenVol. 16(4)
University of Liverpool (GB), Liverpool Women's Hospital (GB), Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, School for Public Health Research
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.