Implicit Neural Representation for Elastic Full‐Waveform Inversion

ABSTRACT Full‐waveform inversion (FWI) has become a cornerstone for high‐resolution seismic imaging, yet it remains computationally demanding and sensitive to initial model assumptions and noise. Recent advances have shown that representing the subsurface model, using implicit neural representations (INRs), can provide compact, continuous and differentiable parameterizations that improve convergence and reduce overfitting. In this study, we extend the INR‐based FWI framework to the elastic regime, with a focus on near‐surface applications and the inversion of surface waves. In particular, we performed the inversion of both synthetic and field surface wave datasets. Our method leverages Deepwave for elastic wave simulation and gradient computation via automatic differentiation. In the synthetic test, we compare the performance obtained using different INR architectures to find the optimal configuration. For the field dataset inversion instead, we compare our results with those obtained using a standard deterministic FWI approach, highlighting its superior robustness with respect to initialization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Prospecting
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.70168
Primary Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implicit Neural Representation for Elastic Full‐Waveform Inversion

E. Stucchi, Mattia Aleardi, Sean Berti
Geophysical Prospecting
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
article

Implicit Neural Representation for Elastic Full‐Waveform Inversion

E. Stucchi, Mattia Aleardi, Sean Berti
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Full‐waveform inversion (FWI) has become a cornerstone for high‐resolution seismic imaging, yet it remains computationally demanding and sensitive to initial model assumptions and noise. Recent advances have shown that representing the subsurface model, using implicit neural representations (INRs), can provide compact, continuous and differentiable parameterizations that improve convergence and reduce overfitting. In this study, we extend the INR‐based FWI framework to the elastic regime, with a focus on near‐surface applications and the inversion of surface waves. In particular, we performed the inversion of both synthetic and field surface wave datasets. Our method leverages Deepwave for elastic wave simulation and gradient computation via automatic differentiation. In the synthetic test, we compare the performance obtained using different INR architectures to find the optimal configuration. For the field dataset inversion instead, we compare our results with those obtained using a standard deterministic FWI approach, highlighting its superior robustness with respect to initialization.

Geophysical ProspectingVol. 74(4)
University of Pisa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.