Resource-Poor, Risk-Rich: Why Small Businesses Struggle to Turn AI Into Strategic Advantage

While many small businesses are adopting artificial intelligence (AI), many struggle to translate this adoption into a lasting and sustainable competitive advantage. This paper posits that this implementation gap is not merely a strategic failure but also introduces significant ethical risks that can harm key stakeholders. Using a dual theoretical framework approach, we employ the resource-based view to identify how “resource poverty,” specifically, gaps in financial, human, technological, and organizational resources, inhibits successful AI implementation. The paper then applies stakeholder theory to illustrate how these internal resource gaps directly lead to external harms, including risks to customer privacy, employee welfare, and broader societal well-being. To address these challenges, a practical four-stage AI capability roadmap is introduced to help small business leaders develop their internal resources and capabilities and establish the necessary ethical safeguards. This roadmap provides a guide for small businesses to navigate the complexities of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Small Business Strategy
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.158957
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resource-Poor, Risk-Rich: Why Small Businesses Struggle to Turn AI Into Strategic Advantage

Scott B. Keller, Ed Ranelli, John Batchelor, Timothy R. Mcilveene et al.
Journal of Small Business Strategy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Resource-Poor, Risk-Rich: Why Small Businesses Struggle to Turn AI Into Strategic Advantage

Scott B. Keller, Ed Ranelli, John Batchelor, Timothy R. Mcilveene, Sonny Nguyen
article en

Abstract

While many small businesses are adopting artificial intelligence (AI), many struggle to translate this adoption into a lasting and sustainable competitive advantage. This paper posits that this implementation gap is not merely a strategic failure but also introduces significant ethical risks that can harm key stakeholders. Using a dual theoretical framework approach, we employ the resource-based view to identify how “resource poverty,” specifically, gaps in financial, human, technological, and organizational resources, inhibits successful AI implementation. The paper then applies stakeholder theory to illustrate how these internal resource gaps directly lead to external harms, including risks to customer privacy, employee welfare, and broader societal well-being. To address these challenges, a practical four-stage AI capability roadmap is introduced to help small business leaders develop their internal resources and capabilities and establish the necessary ethical safeguards. This roadmap provides a guide for small businesses to navigate the complexities of AI.

Journal of Small Business StrategyVol. 36(2)
University of West Florida (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resource-Poor, Risk-Rich: Why Small Businesses Struggle to Turn AI Into Strategic Advantage — Scott B. Keller, Ed Ranelli, et al. · Journal of Small Business Strategy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS