Brain–Heart axis dysfunction in hypertensive patients: A clinical correlation study

Objective: To investigate the clinical correlates of brain–heart axis dysfunction in hypertensive patients by evaluating cardiovascular, neurological, autonomic, and inflammatory profiles. Methods: A prospective clinical correlation study was conducted from October 2024 to September 2025 at Tikrit Teaching Hospital. A total of 350 hypertensive adults (aged 40–75 years) were classified into two groups: 200 with brain–heart axis dysfunction and 150 without. Assessments included cardiovascular (blood pressure, ECG, echocardiography, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, pulse wave velocity), neurological (MRI, Montreal parameters (cardiac biomarkers, inflammatory markers, oxidative stress markers). Results: The study group demonstrated significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure, left ventricular mass index, arterial stiffness, and ECG abnormalities (all p < 0.001). Neurological assessment revealed lower cognitive scores, higher white matter lesion burden, reduced heart rate variability, and impaired baroreflex sensitivity (all p < 0.001). Laboratory findings indicated elevated troponin, NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, IL-6, and malondialdehyde, alongside reduced superoxide dismutase activity (all p < 0.001). Conclusion: Brain–heart axis dysfunction is associated with more severe cardiovascular, neurological, and inflammatory derangements in hypertensive patients. Integrated assessment of autonomic, cognitive, and inflammatory markers may improve risk stratification and guide targeted interventions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Babcock University Medical Journal
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38029/babcockuniv.med.j..v9i1.1334
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brain–Heart axis dysfunction in hypertensive patients: A clinical correlation study

Mohamed Zakari, Bassam Saleh, Abdulsatta Abdullah
Babcock University Medical Journal
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Brain–Heart axis dysfunction in hypertensive patients: A clinical correlation study

Mohamed Zakari, Bassam Saleh, Abdulsatta Abdullah
article en

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical correlates of brain–heart axis dysfunction in hypertensive patients by evaluating cardiovascular, neurological, autonomic, and inflammatory profiles. Methods: A prospective clinical correlation study was conducted from October 2024 to September 2025 at Tikrit Teaching Hospital. A total of 350 hypertensive adults (aged 40–75 years) were classified into two groups: 200 with brain–heart axis dysfunction and 150 without. Assessments included cardiovascular (blood pressure, ECG, echocardiography, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, pulse wave velocity), neurological (MRI, Montreal parameters (cardiac biomarkers, inflammatory markers, oxidative stress markers). Results: The study group demonstrated significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure, left ventricular mass index, arterial stiffness, and ECG abnormalities (all p < 0.001). Neurological assessment revealed lower cognitive scores, higher white matter lesion burden, reduced heart rate variability, and impaired baroreflex sensitivity (all p < 0.001). Laboratory findings indicated elevated troponin, NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, IL-6, and malondialdehyde, alongside reduced superoxide dismutase activity (all p < 0.001). Conclusion: Brain–heart axis dysfunction is associated with more severe cardiovascular, neurological, and inflammatory derangements in hypertensive patients. Integrated assessment of autonomic, cognitive, and inflammatory markers may improve risk stratification and guide targeted interventions.

Babcock University Medical JournalVol. 9(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.