A Mixed Methods Approach to Analyzing the Role of AI Teammates in Transition Phases

Recent innovations in AI have allowed AI agents to work as collaborative teammates; however, these human-AI teams still face significant challenges in achieving high levels of effective coordination and collaboration. Focusing on the temporal nature of teaming, collaboration is often evaluated and improved through transition-phase discussions, held among teammates before or after achieving team goals. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study examines how AI teammates participate in transition-phase discussions and share various types of information, with a focus on situation awareness, impact on team cognition, trust, and performance in human-AI teams. Data from 31 teams completing a three-hour simulated uncrewed aerial system task, comprising four distinct rounds and two transition phases, were analyzed. Quantitative results indicated that AI involvement later in the team's life cycle fostered more trust in the AI teammate, as compared across the four rounds, and was associated with higher performance. Perceived team effectiveness also improved following transition phases the AI teammate participated in, irrespective of whether it occurred early or late in the team's life cycle. Qualitative findings revealed that AI involvement benefits transition phases, particularly when it prompts teammates to recall task details and develop shared knowledge. Based on these results, we demonstrate the value of AI teammates engaging in transition-phase discussions for human-AI teams and provide design recommendations for researchers and practitioners to improve the efficacy of HATs by implementing transition phases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3799438
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mixed Methods Approach to Analyzing the Role of AI Teammates in Transition Phases

Nathan J. McNeese, Beau G. Schelble, Rohit Mallick
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

A Mixed Methods Approach to Analyzing the Role of AI Teammates in Transition Phases

Nathan J. McNeese, Beau G. Schelble, Rohit Mallick
article en

Abstract

Recent innovations in AI have allowed AI agents to work as collaborative teammates; however, these human-AI teams still face significant challenges in achieving high levels of effective coordination and collaboration. Focusing on the temporal nature of teaming, collaboration is often evaluated and improved through transition-phase discussions, held among teammates before or after achieving team goals. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study examines how AI teammates participate in transition-phase discussions and share various types of information, with a focus on situation awareness, impact on team cognition, trust, and performance in human-AI teams. Data from 31 teams completing a three-hour simulated uncrewed aerial system task, comprising four distinct rounds and two transition phases, were analyzed. Quantitative results indicated that AI involvement later in the team's life cycle fostered more trust in the AI teammate, as compared across the four rounds, and was associated with higher performance. Perceived team effectiveness also improved following transition phases the AI teammate participated in, irrespective of whether it occurred early or late in the team's life cycle. Qualitative findings revealed that AI involvement benefits transition phases, particularly when it prompts teammates to recall task details and develop shared knowledge. Based on these results, we demonstrate the value of AI teammates engaging in transition-phase discussions for human-AI teams and provide design recommendations for researchers and practitioners to improve the efficacy of HATs by implementing transition phases.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 10(1)
University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Clemson University (US)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Mixed Methods Approach to Analyzing the Role of AI Teammates in Transition Phases — Nathan J. McNeese, Beau G. Schelble, et al. · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS