Designing for Agency and Affect: Constructive Framing in AI-Generated News Podcasts Reduces Negative Emotion and Enhances Self-Efficacy

The growing prevalence of AI-generated media, particularly podcasts, calls for closer examination of how algorithmic framing shapes audience perception and affective states. As an auditory news format, podcasts offer a distinctive context in which framing effects may be amplified yet remain insufficiently examined. Established research in journalism demonstrates that negative framing, while often enhancing engagement, tends to heighten emotional arousal and cognitive bias. In AI-generated news, these tendencies risk being amplified by large-scale automated production and optimization. This study investigates listener responses to news podcasts generated by large language models (LLMs), comparing the effects of constructive versus non-constructive framing on emotional states and self-efficacy. We operationalize non-constructive framing as narratives that emphasize conflict, failure, and unresolved consequences without offering pathways for resolution, whereas constructive framing systematically integrates solution-oriented perspectives, future-oriented trajectories, and cues that foreground individual or collective agency. We developed a generative podcast pipeline that integrates prompt engineering and text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis to produce paired podcast versions from identical news content. A mixed-methods empirical study ( N = 65) compared the two framing strategies in terms of their effects on emotional response and self-efficacy. The results showed that constructive framing led to a significant reduction in negative emotions compared to non-constructive framing. Furthermore, constructive framing enhanced listeners’ perceived self-efficacy in contexts where the news topics afforded interpretable and actionable forms of agency, highlighting how framing interacts with topic characteristics to shape motivational outcomes. By extending established framing-effect theories into the domain of AI-generated auditory news, this work provides empirical insights into how framing mechanisms in AI-generated media shape user experience and well-being, and inform the design of AI-generated media systems that balance engagement optimization with ethical considerations of emotional impact and agency support within human–computer interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Design for Augmented Humanity
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29776481261438705
Primary Topic
Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing for Agency and Affect: Constructive Framing in AI-Generated News Podcasts Reduces Negative Emotion and Enhances Self-Efficacy

Wen Li Ku, Yihan Liu, Pengcheng An, Wei Zhang
Design for Augmented Humanity
Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
article

Designing for Agency and Affect: Constructive Framing in AI-Generated News Podcasts Reduces Negative Emotion and Enhances Self-Efficacy

Wen Li Ku, Yihan Liu, Pengcheng An, Wei Zhang
article en

Abstract

The growing prevalence of AI-generated media, particularly podcasts, calls for closer examination of how algorithmic framing shapes audience perception and affective states. As an auditory news format, podcasts offer a distinctive context in which framing effects may be amplified yet remain insufficiently examined. Established research in journalism demonstrates that negative framing, while often enhancing engagement, tends to heighten emotional arousal and cognitive bias. In AI-generated news, these tendencies risk being amplified by large-scale automated production and optimization. This study investigates listener responses to news podcasts generated by large language models (LLMs), comparing the effects of constructive versus non-constructive framing on emotional states and self-efficacy. We operationalize non-constructive framing as narratives that emphasize conflict, failure, and unresolved consequences without offering pathways for resolution, whereas constructive framing systematically integrates solution-oriented perspectives, future-oriented trajectories, and cues that foreground individual or collective agency. We developed a generative podcast pipeline that integrates prompt engineering and text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis to produce paired podcast versions from identical news content. A mixed-methods empirical study ( N = 65) compared the two framing strategies in terms of their effects on emotional response and self-efficacy. The results showed that constructive framing led to a significant reduction in negative emotions compared to non-constructive framing. Furthermore, constructive framing enhanced listeners’ perceived self-efficacy in contexts where the news topics afforded interpretable and actionable forms of agency, highlighting how framing interacts with topic characteristics to shape motivational outcomes. By extending established framing-effect theories into the domain of AI-generated auditory news, this work provides empirical insights into how framing mechanisms in AI-generated media shape user experience and well-being, and inform the design of AI-generated media systems that balance engagement optimization with ethical considerations of emotional impact and agency support within human–computer interaction.

Design for Augmented Humanity
Shenzhen University (CN), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.