Using Artificial Intelligence for Eliciting Diagnostic Evidence From Students’ Drawings

Abstract: While artificial intelligence (AI) gained attention for eliciting diagnostic evidence from text answers using NLP or for generating visual stimuli, few studies investigate its use for analyzing visual data such as free-hand sketches from graphical response formats. The present case study is based on a formative assessment including instructional considerations and illustrates the application of three AI approaches to graphical responses from 96 students. Students answered two tasks assessing the conceptual understanding of fractions. Comparisons of AI approaches to expert ratings reveal promising results of two approaches (rule-based approach and ResNet). The third approach using a pretrained clip model showed lower performance, especially in tasks requiring counting. Additional comparisons to diagnostic evidence from other items highlight the relevance of graphical response items as a distinct item format. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of the approaches, as well as the case study, and hint to topics for further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Test Adaptation and Development
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000123
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Artificial Intelligence for Eliciting Diagnostic Evidence From Students’ Drawings

Marie Steinke, Ulf Kroehne, Corinna Hankeln, Sonja Hahn et al.
Psychological Test Adaptation and Development
Data Visualization and Analytics
article

Using Artificial Intelligence for Eliciting Diagnostic Evidence From Students’ Drawings

Marie Steinke, Ulf Kroehne, Corinna Hankeln, Sonja Hahn, Leon Lukas Hammerla, Sebastian Gross, Christina M. Röper Korf
article en

Abstract

Abstract: While artificial intelligence (AI) gained attention for eliciting diagnostic evidence from text answers using NLP or for generating visual stimuli, few studies investigate its use for analyzing visual data such as free-hand sketches from graphical response formats. The present case study is based on a formative assessment including instructional considerations and illustrates the application of three AI approaches to graphical responses from 96 students. Students answered two tasks assessing the conceptual understanding of fractions. Comparisons of AI approaches to expert ratings reveal promising results of two approaches (rule-based approach and ResNet). The third approach using a pretrained clip model showed lower performance, especially in tasks requiring counting. Additional comparisons to diagnostic evidence from other items highlight the relevance of graphical response items as a distinct item format. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of the approaches, as well as the case study, and hint to topics for further research.

Psychological Test Adaptation and DevelopmentVol. 7
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), TU Dortmund University (DE), Chemnitz University of Technology (DE), DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Data Visualization and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.