Attraction versus avoidance: honeybees vary in response to virus-contaminated food

Pathogen detection plays a key role in enabling hosts to avoid infection. Many insects, including honeybees (Apis mellifera, L.), can detect pathogens indirectly, but it is unclear whether they can directly detect viruses outside of a host. We conducted cage and field choice assays using unadulterated and virus-spiked sucrose solutions to assess detection and behavioural responses of honeybees to virus-contaminated foods. In cage trials, nurse-aged bees generally preferred unadulterated sucrose solution in the summer, but showed a significant preference for virus-spiked solutions containing deformed wing virus (DWV), black queen cell virus or chronic bee paralysis virus in the fall. In field trials, forager bees exhibited significantly higher visitation to, and consumption of, sucrose solutions with high concentrations of DWV compared to low DWV or virus-free controls in both the spring and fall. These findings demonstrate that honeybees can directly detect the presence of viruses in contaminated food sources, which has important implications for pathogen transmission within pollinator communities and disease management strategies aimed at improving honeybee health. However, the mechanisms underlying these phenomena remain unknown. Further research is needed to determine how virus presence alters honeybee behaviour and impacts social immune function, foraging behaviours and colony health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology Letters
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2025.0630
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attraction versus avoidance: honeybees vary in response to virus-contaminated food

Alexandria N. Payne, Elizabeth M. Walsh, Paula Castillo, Andrew Diaz et al.
1 citations
Biology Letters
Insect and Pesticide Research
22.25
article

Attraction versus avoidance: honeybees vary in response to virus-contaminated food

Alexandria N. Payne, Elizabeth M. Walsh, Paula Castillo, Andrew Diaz, Joseph McCarthy, Michael Simone-Finstrom
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pathogen detection plays a key role in enabling hosts to avoid infection. Many insects, including honeybees (Apis mellifera, L.), can detect pathogens indirectly, but it is unclear whether they can directly detect viruses outside of a host. We conducted cage and field choice assays using unadulterated and virus-spiked sucrose solutions to assess detection and behavioural responses of honeybees to virus-contaminated foods. In cage trials, nurse-aged bees generally preferred unadulterated sucrose solution in the summer, but showed a significant preference for virus-spiked solutions containing deformed wing virus (DWV), black queen cell virus or chronic bee paralysis virus in the fall. In field trials, forager bees exhibited significantly higher visitation to, and consumption of, sucrose solutions with high concentrations of DWV compared to low DWV or virus-free controls in both the spring and fall. These findings demonstrate that honeybees can directly detect the presence of viruses in contaminated food sources, which has important implications for pathogen transmission within pollinator communities and disease management strategies aimed at improving honeybee health. However, the mechanisms underlying these phenomena remain unknown. Further research is needed to determine how virus presence alters honeybee behaviour and impacts social immune function, foraging behaviours and colony health.

Biology LettersVol. 22(4)
Louisiana State University System (US), Louisiana State University (US), Oak Ridge Associated Universities (US), Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Agricultural Research Service
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Insect and Pesticide Research
22.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.