Employee Poaching as An Abuse of Dominance Under Article 102 TFEU

Abstract Poaching employees is an inherent aspect of competition for highly qualified talent. This practice is particularly, but not only, pronounced among tech giants, which engage in fierce competition to recruit skilled workers from their rivals. However, when, in a concentrated market, a dominant undertaking strategically targets and hires a large portion—or even the entirety—of a smaller competitor’s key personnel, this behavior can raise significant competition concerns. Such cases often fall outside the scope of merger control, particularly because they fail to meet the applicable thresholds (Section II), warranting consideration of the issue under the abuse of dominance prohibition in Article 102 TFEU. This article—also drawing on relevant case law and scholarship regarding the category of “predatory hiring” under Section 2 of the Sherman Act—explores the conditions under which such poaching by a dominant undertaking may constitute exclusionary abuse (Section IV) and structural abuse (Section V) in both product and labor markets. The findings clearly demonstrate that competition law assessments of a dominant undertaking’s conduct must consider not only the product market but also the labor market, particularly in cases of significant market structure changes (Section III).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhag007
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Employee Poaching as An Abuse of Dominance Under Article 102 TFEU

Björn Christian Becker
Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

Employee Poaching as An Abuse of Dominance Under Article 102 TFEU

Björn Christian Becker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Poaching employees is an inherent aspect of competition for highly qualified talent. This practice is particularly, but not only, pronounced among tech giants, which engage in fierce competition to recruit skilled workers from their rivals. However, when, in a concentrated market, a dominant undertaking strategically targets and hires a large portion—or even the entirety—of a smaller competitor’s key personnel, this behavior can raise significant competition concerns. Such cases often fall outside the scope of merger control, particularly because they fail to meet the applicable thresholds (Section II), warranting consideration of the issue under the abuse of dominance prohibition in Article 102 TFEU. This article—also drawing on relevant case law and scholarship regarding the category of “predatory hiring” under Section 2 of the Sherman Act—explores the conditions under which such poaching by a dominant undertaking may constitute exclusionary abuse (Section IV) and structural abuse (Section V) in both product and labor markets. The findings clearly demonstrate that competition law assessments of a dominant undertaking’s conduct must consider not only the product market but also the labor market, particularly in cases of significant market structure changes (Section III).

Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Employee Poaching as An Abuse of Dominance Under Article 102 TFEU — Björn Christian Becker · Journal of Competition Law & Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS