Early or Late CP Acquisition? Evidence from topics and other CP diagnostics in Germanic–Romance bilinguals

Although extensively studied in monolinguals, research on the development of functional categories in bilingual children remains limited (for a discussion, see Meisel, 1990; Paradis & Genesee, 1997; Serratrice, 2000; Müller, 2022). This paper contributes novel data through two corpus studies on the development of the left periphery in Germanic–Romance bilinguals acquiring German-Italian, German-Spanish and Dutch-Italian. In the first study, I show that (some) CP structures are produced early across all languages and children, while the development of topicalization strategies (e.g., topicalization vs. Clitic Left Dislocation) shows strong language-specific effects. Topics are systematically early-acquired in their Germanic languages, whereas CLLD in Romance emerges significantly later – corroborating findings from monolingual studies (among many others, Boser et al., 1992; Santelmann, 1995; Westergaard, 2009; Grinstead, 2004; Tsimpli, 2005; Soares, 2006). A second, supplementary corpus study on the development of cliticization furthermore shows that the late development of CLLD is not attributable to (similarly) late development of clitics; it is specific to CLLD. I explore potential explanations for this language-driven asymmetry, particularly their relative parametric complexity. Overall, I propose these results are problematic for approaches assuming crosslinguistically fixed and late development of CP, such as mainstream maturational approaches (i.a., Radford, 1990; Friedmann et al., 2021), favoring instead early CP development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.128835
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early or Late CP Acquisition? Evidence from topics and other CP diagnostics in Germanic–Romance bilinguals

Núria Bosch Masip
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Language Development and Disorders
article

Early or Late CP Acquisition? Evidence from topics and other CP diagnostics in Germanic–Romance bilinguals

Núria Bosch Masip
article en

Abstract

Although extensively studied in monolinguals, research on the development of functional categories in bilingual children remains limited (for a discussion, see Meisel, 1990; Paradis & Genesee, 1997; Serratrice, 2000; Müller, 2022). This paper contributes novel data through two corpus studies on the development of the left periphery in Germanic–Romance bilinguals acquiring German-Italian, German-Spanish and Dutch-Italian. In the first study, I show that (some) CP structures are produced early across all languages and children, while the development of topicalization strategies (e.g., topicalization vs. Clitic Left Dislocation) shows strong language-specific effects. Topics are systematically early-acquired in their Germanic languages, whereas CLLD in Romance emerges significantly later – corroborating findings from monolingual studies (among many others, Boser et al., 1992; Santelmann, 1995; Westergaard, 2009; Grinstead, 2004; Tsimpli, 2005; Soares, 2006). A second, supplementary corpus study on the development of cliticization furthermore shows that the late development of CLLD is not attributable to (similarly) late development of clitics; it is specific to CLLD. I explore potential explanations for this language-driven asymmetry, particularly their relative parametric complexity. Overall, I propose these results are problematic for approaches assuming crosslinguistically fixed and late development of CP, such as mainstream maturational approaches (i.a., Radford, 1990; Friedmann et al., 2021), favoring instead early CP development.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.