Bayesian Random‐Effects Meta‐Analysis of Aggregate Data on Clinical Events

To investigate intervention effects on rare events, meta-analysis techniques are commonly applied in order to assess the accumulated evidence. When it comes to adverse effects in clinical trials, these are often most adequately handled using survival methods. A common-effect model that is able to process data in commonly quoted formats in terms of hazard ratios has previously been proposed for this purpose. In order to accommodate potential heterogeneity between studies, we have extended the model by Holzhauer to a random-effects approach. The Bayesian model is described in detail, and applications to realistic data sets are discussed along with sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations to support the conclusions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70508
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian Random‐Effects Meta‐Analysis of Aggregate Data on Clinical Events

Statistics in Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Bayesian Random‐Effects Meta‐Analysis of Aggregate Data on Clinical Events

article en

Abstract

To investigate intervention effects on rare events, meta-analysis techniques are commonly applied in order to assess the accumulated evidence. When it comes to adverse effects in clinical trials, these are often most adequately handled using survival methods. A common-effect model that is able to process data in commonly quoted formats in terms of hazard ratios has previously been proposed for this purpose. In order to accommodate potential heterogeneity between studies, we have extended the model by Holzhauer to a random-effects approach. The Bayesian model is described in detail, and applications to realistic data sets are discussed along with sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations to support the conclusions.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 45(8-9)
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt (Germany) (DE), Zimmer Biomet (Netherlands) (NL), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bayesian Random‐Effects Meta‐Analysis of Aggregate Data on Clinical Events · Statistics in Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS