Carbon dioxide (CO2) storage in geological formations: Overview of mechanisms, storage media, leakage risk, and monitoring techniques

The continuous rise in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions poses severe environmental challenges, including global warming and climate change. Geological CO 2 storage (GCS) has emerged as a reliable and large-scale mitigation strategy capable of securely immobilizing captured CO 2 within subsurface formations. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of CO 2 storage mechanisms, storage media, hydrate-based trapping, leakage detection, and the associated challenges. Four primary trapping mechanisms (structural, residual, solubility, and mineral) govern the immobilization of injected CO 2 under varying pressure, temperature, and geochemical conditions. Diverse geological media such as saline aquifers, depleted gas reservoirs, unmineable coal seams, basalts, and shale formations offer complementary storage advantages, with capacities ranging from hundreds to thousands of gigatonnes of CO 2 gas. The formation of CO 2 hydrates in marine and permafrost sediments provides an additional self-sealing, high-density storage pathway, supported by CO 2 -CH 4 replacement kinetics and experimental evidence from scaled and microfluidic studies. Ensuring storage integrity requires integrated multi-scale monitoring, where seismic methods image CO 2 plume evolution, electromagnetic techniques track resistivity changes associated with fluid substitution, geochemical monitoring detects variations in fluid composition and reaction products indicative of CO 2 migration or trapping, and interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) identifies surface deformation related to pressure-induced geomechanical responses. Despite its promise, GCS faces challenges including reservoir heterogeneity, caprock integrity, injectivity constraints, and socioeconomic barriers. However, technological advancements in real-time monitoring, microfluidics, and predictive modeling, alongside supportive regulatory frameworks, are progressively mitigating these risks. Collectively, this review emphasizes that integrating multidisciplinary insights and developing standardized monitoring protocols are critical for achieving safe, verifiable, and large-scale CO 2 storage, an essential step toward global carbon neutrality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Petroleum Research
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2026.03.007
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon dioxide (CO2) storage in geological formations: Overview of mechanisms, storage media, leakage risk, and monitoring techniques

Eugene N. Ngouangna, Nasiru Salahu Muhammed, Augustine Agi, Afeez Gbadamosi et al.
Petroleum Research
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Carbon dioxide (CO2) storage in geological formations: Overview of mechanisms, storage media, leakage risk, and monitoring techniques

Eugene N. Ngouangna, Nasiru Salahu Muhammed, Augustine Agi, Afeez Gbadamosi, Funsho Afolabi, B. Haq, Sakinat Damare Abubakar, Grant Charles Mwakinpunda
article en

Abstract

The continuous rise in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions poses severe environmental challenges, including global warming and climate change. Geological CO 2 storage (GCS) has emerged as a reliable and large-scale mitigation strategy capable of securely immobilizing captured CO 2 within subsurface formations. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of CO 2 storage mechanisms, storage media, hydrate-based trapping, leakage detection, and the associated challenges. Four primary trapping mechanisms (structural, residual, solubility, and mineral) govern the immobilization of injected CO 2 under varying pressure, temperature, and geochemical conditions. Diverse geological media such as saline aquifers, depleted gas reservoirs, unmineable coal seams, basalts, and shale formations offer complementary storage advantages, with capacities ranging from hundreds to thousands of gigatonnes of CO 2 gas. The formation of CO 2 hydrates in marine and permafrost sediments provides an additional self-sealing, high-density storage pathway, supported by CO 2 -CH 4 replacement kinetics and experimental evidence from scaled and microfluidic studies. Ensuring storage integrity requires integrated multi-scale monitoring, where seismic methods image CO 2 plume evolution, electromagnetic techniques track resistivity changes associated with fluid substitution, geochemical monitoring detects variations in fluid composition and reaction products indicative of CO 2 migration or trapping, and interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) identifies surface deformation related to pressure-induced geomechanical responses. Despite its promise, GCS faces challenges including reservoir heterogeneity, caprock integrity, injectivity constraints, and socioeconomic barriers. However, technological advancements in real-time monitoring, microfluidics, and predictive modeling, alongside supportive regulatory frameworks, are progressively mitigating these risks. Collectively, this review emphasizes that integrating multidisciplinary insights and developing standardized monitoring protocols are critical for achieving safe, verifiable, and large-scale CO 2 storage, an essential step toward global carbon neutrality.

Petroleum Research
Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (MY), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University (SA), Universiti Teknologi Petronas (MY), China University of Geosciences (CN), University of Malaya (MY), Modibbo Adama University of Technology (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.