Identifying structural and dynamic features of proteins for machine learning models that predict rates of energy transfer

The flow of vibrational energy in proteins is mediated both by protein structure and structural fluctuations. However, detailed information about contributions of physical properties that mediate energy flow is still lacking. In this report, we present analyses of more than 105 rates of energy transfer across non-covalent contacts of a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) and several mutants using models that account for specific structural and dynamic features. Two models are considered, one including only structural features and a second including structural and dynamic properties. While dynamic properties are found to play a substantial role in energy transfer across non-covalent contacts, a structural model with appropriately chosen physical features can predict rates of energy transfer about as well as models incorporating both structural and dynamic features, apparently due to correlations between structural fluctuations and structure, which are also examined. The work presented here indicates that energy flow in GPCRs and likely other proteins may be predicted using relatively simple models trained with structural information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0325036
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying structural and dynamic features of proteins for machine learning models that predict rates of energy transfer

David M. Leitner, Pritom Bose
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Protein Structure and Dynamics
article

Identifying structural and dynamic features of proteins for machine learning models that predict rates of energy transfer

David M. Leitner, Pritom Bose
article en

Abstract

The flow of vibrational energy in proteins is mediated both by protein structure and structural fluctuations. However, detailed information about contributions of physical properties that mediate energy flow is still lacking. In this report, we present analyses of more than 105 rates of energy transfer across non-covalent contacts of a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) and several mutants using models that account for specific structural and dynamic features. Two models are considered, one including only structural features and a second including structural and dynamic properties. While dynamic properties are found to play a substantial role in energy transfer across non-covalent contacts, a structural model with appropriately chosen physical features can predict rates of energy transfer about as well as models incorporating both structural and dynamic features, apparently due to correlations between structural fluctuations and structure, which are also examined. The work presented here indicates that energy flow in GPCRs and likely other proteins may be predicted using relatively simple models trained with structural information.

The Journal of Chemical PhysicsVol. 164(13)
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Division of Chemistry
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.