Occlusion Break Surge Performance of a Next Generation Phacoemulsification System

PURPOSE: To compare occlusion break surge volumes of UNITY® Vitreoretinal Cataract System (UVCS) with CENTURION® Vision System with Active Sentry™ (CAS). SETTING: Alcon Research, Ltd., Lake Forest, California, USA. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: An eye model representing average human eye compliance was used to determine average occlusion break surge volumes. UVCS was tested at target intraocular pressures (IOPs) of 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 80 mmHg; vacuum limits of 300, 400, 500, 600, and 650 mmHg; and aspiration flow rates of 20 and 40 cc/min. CAS was tested at target IOPs of 30, 40, 50, 60, and 80 mmHg, and at the same set vacuum limits and aspiration flow rates as UVCS. Additionally, a second order polynomial was fit to the entire data set to compare UVCS and CAS at a target IOP of 20 mmHg. RESULTS: After calculating sample means at each setpoint combination, the largest mean surge volume was 48 µL for UVCS and 75 µL for CAS, corresponding to 19% and 30%, respectively, of the average human phakic anterior chamber volume. For all common setpoint combinations, mean occlusion break surge volumes were 44% lower for UVCS than CAS. At a flow rate of 40 cc/min and IOP setpoint of 20 mmHg, UVCS showed a 46% average decrease across all vacuum limits. CONCLUSION: UVCS demonstrated lower mean surge volumes following occlusion break than CAS. This may give surgeons greater confidence operating at lower IOPs and may reduce the risk of posterior capsule rupture, especially in complex cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001951
Primary Topic
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occlusion Break Surge Performance of a Next Generation Phacoemulsification System

Kevin M. Miller, Satish Yalamanchili, David W. Dyk, Sarah Makari et al.
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
article

Occlusion Break Surge Performance of a Next Generation Phacoemulsification System

Kevin M. Miller, Satish Yalamanchili, David W. Dyk, Sarah Makari, Ali Aboughaida
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare occlusion break surge volumes of UNITY® Vitreoretinal Cataract System (UVCS) with CENTURION® Vision System with Active Sentry™ (CAS). SETTING: Alcon Research, Ltd., Lake Forest, California, USA. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: An eye model representing average human eye compliance was used to determine average occlusion break surge volumes. UVCS was tested at target intraocular pressures (IOPs) of 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 80 mmHg; vacuum limits of 300, 400, 500, 600, and 650 mmHg; and aspiration flow rates of 20 and 40 cc/min. CAS was tested at target IOPs of 30, 40, 50, 60, and 80 mmHg, and at the same set vacuum limits and aspiration flow rates as UVCS. Additionally, a second order polynomial was fit to the entire data set to compare UVCS and CAS at a target IOP of 20 mmHg. RESULTS: After calculating sample means at each setpoint combination, the largest mean surge volume was 48 µL for UVCS and 75 µL for CAS, corresponding to 19% and 30%, respectively, of the average human phakic anterior chamber volume. For all common setpoint combinations, mean occlusion break surge volumes were 44% lower for UVCS than CAS. At a flow rate of 40 cc/min and IOP setpoint of 20 mmHg, UVCS showed a 46% average decrease across all vacuum limits. CONCLUSION: UVCS demonstrated lower mean surge volumes following occlusion break than CAS. This may give surgeons greater confidence operating at lower IOPs and may reduce the risk of posterior capsule rupture, especially in complex cases.

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Alcon (United States) (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.