Developing a shared pedagogical statement for a university psychology teaching department: is it possible?

Objective: The Australian Psychology Accreditation Council (APAC) requires higher education providers to have a pedagogical statement that describes their collective approach to curriculum design and delivery. The current study describes the process taken by one regional Australian university when attempting to develop such a statement. Method: A multi-stage, embedded mixed-methods approach, incorporating student feedback, staff reflexivity, and dialogic methods were used. Participants' accounts of their personal pedagogy and practices were expected to inform the development of a coherent pedagogical statement, through an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Results: Despite participants' professional experience and content expertise, we were unable to develop a traditional pedagogical statement due to their limited awareness of the theoretical framework/s that inform their practice. Instead, we developed a values-based teaching statement that described what the team considered professionally important. Participation in the project was reported to improve confidence in discussing and conceptualising pedagogy among staff. Conclusion: Values underpin teacher philosophies and practices and may encourage further reflection, exploration, and communication of relevant pedagogical concepts, including teacher philosophies and practices. Findings from the current research have important implications for the development of pedagogical culture locally, as well as for accrediting bodies, universities, and individual educators more broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Psychology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2026.2635899
Primary Topic
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a shared pedagogical statement for a university psychology teaching department: is it possible?

Cassandra K. Dittman, Paul Duckett, Lisa Lole, Michelle Gossner et al.
Australian Journal of Psychology
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
article

Developing a shared pedagogical statement for a university psychology teaching department: is it possible?

Cassandra K. Dittman, Paul Duckett, Lisa Lole, Michelle Gossner, Sharleen Keleher
article en

Abstract

Objective: The Australian Psychology Accreditation Council (APAC) requires higher education providers to have a pedagogical statement that describes their collective approach to curriculum design and delivery. The current study describes the process taken by one regional Australian university when attempting to develop such a statement. Method: A multi-stage, embedded mixed-methods approach, incorporating student feedback, staff reflexivity, and dialogic methods were used. Participants' accounts of their personal pedagogy and practices were expected to inform the development of a coherent pedagogical statement, through an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Results: Despite participants' professional experience and content expertise, we were unable to develop a traditional pedagogical statement due to their limited awareness of the theoretical framework/s that inform their practice. Instead, we developed a values-based teaching statement that described what the team considered professionally important. Participation in the project was reported to improve confidence in discussing and conceptualising pedagogy among staff. Conclusion: Values underpin teacher philosophies and practices and may encourage further reflection, exploration, and communication of relevant pedagogical concepts, including teacher philosophies and practices. Findings from the current research have important implications for the development of pedagogical culture locally, as well as for accrediting bodies, universities, and individual educators more broadly.

Australian Journal of PsychologyVol. 78(1)
The University of Queensland (AU), Central Queensland University (AU)
Central Queensland University
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.