Integrating rainfall return periods in MCDA-based flood risk mapping: a fuzzy-AHP case study in an ungauged watershed

Flooding is one of the most devastating hydrological disasters, severely impacting human lives and the environment. Effective flood risk analysis is crucial for mitigation, as it identifies areas most susceptible to flooding. One common approach is to combine Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) with Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which allows decision-makers to map vulnerable areas even when observational data are limited. However, previous studies often neglected the probabilistic nature of extreme events. This study aims to fill the gap by incorporating rainfall return periods into the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchical Process (Fuzzy AHP) to evaluate its impact on flood risk mapping. The framework considers rainfall scenarios together with key factors that affect flooding. These factors include elevation, slope, river density, distance to rivers, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), soil type, land use/land cover, population density, female ratio, poverty ratio, and road density. Six rainfall return periods (2, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 years) with three distinct intensity-duration patterns are included in the analysis. In total, 18 rainfall scenarios were generated by combining high-intensity, short-duration, moderate-intensity, moderate-duration, and low-intensity, long-duration events. Including rainfall return periods gave a more balanced view of flood risk factors, with rainfall, elevation, and slope showing the strongest correlations (± 0.7). Validation with Sentinel-1 SAR data showed that incorporating rainfall return periods into Fuzzy AHP produced a more robust result. Over 90% of the flooded pixels in the Sentinel-1 SAR imagery were correctly classified into the three highest-risk classes: Moderate-to-high, High, and Very-high. In contrast, models that did not embed the rainfall return periods misclassified more than 70% of flooded pixels into lower-risk classes. Our findings highlight the importance of considering rainfall return periods for accurate regional flood risk assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-026-03211-4
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating rainfall return periods in MCDA-based flood risk mapping: a fuzzy-AHP case study in an ungauged watershed

Masria Masria, Satoru Oishi, Haryati M. Sengadji, Atsushi Hamada et al.
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Integrating rainfall return periods in MCDA-based flood risk mapping: a fuzzy-AHP case study in an ungauged watershed

Masria Masria, Satoru Oishi, Haryati M. Sengadji, Atsushi Hamada, Magfira Syarifuddin, Chris Natali Namah
article en

Abstract

Flooding is one of the most devastating hydrological disasters, severely impacting human lives and the environment. Effective flood risk analysis is crucial for mitigation, as it identifies areas most susceptible to flooding. One common approach is to combine Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) with Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which allows decision-makers to map vulnerable areas even when observational data are limited. However, previous studies often neglected the probabilistic nature of extreme events. This study aims to fill the gap by incorporating rainfall return periods into the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchical Process (Fuzzy AHP) to evaluate its impact on flood risk mapping. The framework considers rainfall scenarios together with key factors that affect flooding. These factors include elevation, slope, river density, distance to rivers, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), soil type, land use/land cover, population density, female ratio, poverty ratio, and road density. Six rainfall return periods (2, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 years) with three distinct intensity-duration patterns are included in the analysis. In total, 18 rainfall scenarios were generated by combining high-intensity, short-duration, moderate-intensity, moderate-duration, and low-intensity, long-duration events. Including rainfall return periods gave a more balanced view of flood risk factors, with rainfall, elevation, and slope showing the strongest correlations (± 0.7). Validation with Sentinel-1 SAR data showed that incorporating rainfall return periods into Fuzzy AHP produced a more robust result. Over 90% of the flooded pixels in the Sentinel-1 SAR imagery were correctly classified into the three highest-risk classes: Moderate-to-high, High, and Very-high. In contrast, models that did not embed the rainfall return periods misclassified more than 70% of flooded pixels into lower-risk classes. Our findings highlight the importance of considering rainfall return periods for accurate regional flood risk assessment.

Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk AssessmentVol. 40(4)
Chiba University (JP), RIKEN Center for Computational Science (JP), Universitas Muhammadiyah Kupang (ID), University of Toyama (JP), Kobe University (JP)
Japan Science and Technology Agency
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.