Efficacy of thulium fiber laser litothripsy on large renal stones (> 1000 mm³) according to Hounsfield units: a prospective single-center study

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) lithotripsy based on stone density and factors affecting success in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal calculi > 1000 mm3. Eighty-one patients who underwent RIRS with TFL for renal calculi > 1000 mm3 were evaluated prospectively and categorized into two groups based on stone density [Group 1:<1000 Hounsfield Units (HU); Group 2:≥1000 HU]. Demographic data, stone-free rates (SFRs), need for second RIRS, and complications were also recorded. Laser parameters, including lasing time, energy usage, ablation speed, efficiency, and energy consumption, were calculated. Mean HU values differed significantly between groups (731.65 ± 220.54 vs. 1207.92 ± 147.75,p = 0.001). Laser energy consumption was lower in group 2 (14.83 ± 10.15 vs. 18.01 ± 16.02 J/mm3,p = 0.045).No significant differences were observed in the other laser parameters (ablation efficiency, ablation speed, total energy used). Need for second RIRS rates were similar (26.83% vs. 30.00%,p = 0.752). SFRs after first and second RIRS were comparable between the groups (53.66% vs. 40.00%,p = 0.218; 70.73% vs. 57.50%,p = 0.214).Laser ablation efficiency (p = 0.004), ablation speed (p = 0.036), and operative time (p < 0.001) positively correlated with SFR in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis.Stone location, and preoperative double J stent presence did not affect SFRs. The complication rate was 12.35%, with most complications being mild (Clavien I and II). TFL is effective and safe for treating large kidney stones using RIRS. Stone density did not significantly affect the outcomes, suggesting TFL’s versatility across different stone compositions. TFL lithotripsy is a promising option for the treatment of large renal calculi. NCT07153978.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Urology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-026-02138-w
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of thulium fiber laser litothripsy on large renal stones (> 1000 mm³) according to Hounsfield units: a prospective single-center study

Muharrem Baturu, Ömer Bayrak, Mustafa Kiraç, Sakıp Erturhan et al.
BMC Urology
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Efficacy of thulium fiber laser litothripsy on large renal stones (> 1000 mm³) according to Hounsfield units: a prospective single-center study

Muharrem Baturu, Ömer Bayrak, Mustafa Kiraç, Sakıp Erturhan, Ilker Seckiner
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) lithotripsy based on stone density and factors affecting success in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal calculi > 1000 mm3. Eighty-one patients who underwent RIRS with TFL for renal calculi > 1000 mm3 were evaluated prospectively and categorized into two groups based on stone density [Group 1:<1000 Hounsfield Units (HU); Group 2:≥1000 HU]. Demographic data, stone-free rates (SFRs), need for second RIRS, and complications were also recorded. Laser parameters, including lasing time, energy usage, ablation speed, efficiency, and energy consumption, were calculated. Mean HU values differed significantly between groups (731.65 ± 220.54 vs. 1207.92 ± 147.75,p = 0.001). Laser energy consumption was lower in group 2 (14.83 ± 10.15 vs. 18.01 ± 16.02 J/mm3,p = 0.045).No significant differences were observed in the other laser parameters (ablation efficiency, ablation speed, total energy used). Need for second RIRS rates were similar (26.83% vs. 30.00%,p = 0.752). SFRs after first and second RIRS were comparable between the groups (53.66% vs. 40.00%,p = 0.218; 70.73% vs. 57.50%,p = 0.214).Laser ablation efficiency (p = 0.004), ablation speed (p = 0.036), and operative time (p < 0.001) positively correlated with SFR in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis.Stone location, and preoperative double J stent presence did not affect SFRs. The complication rate was 12.35%, with most complications being mild (Clavien I and II). TFL is effective and safe for treating large kidney stones using RIRS. Stone density did not significantly affect the outcomes, suggesting TFL’s versatility across different stone compositions. TFL lithotripsy is a promising option for the treatment of large renal calculi. NCT07153978.

BMC Urology
Sanko University (TR), Gaziantep University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.