Tokenized Finance

Tokenization—the representation of financial assets and liabilities on programmable digital ledgers—is increasingly shaping financial system developments. The most consequential transformation is occurring within the regulated financial system, including banks, asset managers, and financial market infrastructures, where tokenization can enable atomic settlement, continuous liquidity management, and embedded compliance. This paper argues that tokenization constitutes a structural shift in financial architecture rather than a marginal efficiency improvement. It describes how permissioned shared ledgers, programmable financial assets, and smart contract-based risk management alter the nature of settlement, liquidity, and systemic risk. The paper emphasizes that the long-term success of tokenization depends on anchoring digital finance in public trust through clear policy frameworks and safe settlement assets, robust governance of code, legal certainty, and international coordination. Absent such anchors, tokenization risks amplifying financial instability through speed, concentration, and fragmentation, as contract-based risk management alter the nature of settlement, liquidity, and systemic risk.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IMF Notes
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229042468.068
Primary Topic
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tokenized Finance

Tobias Adrian
IMF Notes
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
article

Tokenized Finance

Tobias Adrian
article en

Abstract

Tokenization—the representation of financial assets and liabilities on programmable digital ledgers—is increasingly shaping financial system developments. The most consequential transformation is occurring within the regulated financial system, including banks, asset managers, and financial market infrastructures, where tokenization can enable atomic settlement, continuous liquidity management, and embedded compliance. This paper argues that tokenization constitutes a structural shift in financial architecture rather than a marginal efficiency improvement. It describes how permissioned shared ledgers, programmable financial assets, and smart contract-based risk management alter the nature of settlement, liquidity, and systemic risk. The paper emphasizes that the long-term success of tokenization depends on anchoring digital finance in public trust through clear policy frameworks and safe settlement assets, robust governance of code, legal certainty, and international coordination. Absent such anchors, tokenization risks amplifying financial instability through speed, concentration, and fragmentation, as contract-based risk management alter the nature of settlement, liquidity, and systemic risk.

IMF NotesVol. 2026(001)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.