The Yield of Staging Investigations in Patients with Breast Cancer Planned for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) represent a diverse population including high-risk early breast cancer (EBC) and locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Staging investigations are routinely performed, but the clinical utility is unclear. METHODS: Using a provincial cancer registry, we identified breast cancer patients referred for NAC between 2020 and 2022. Patients with staging investigations were stratified into EBC (anatomic clinical stage I-II) and LABC (stage III). Rates of metastatic (M1) disease and associated factors were assessed. RESULTS: < 0.001). A higher cT/N stage correlated with M1 disease in LABC, although most subgroups demonstrated rates of ≥10%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support a risk-adapted approach to pre-treatment staging in patients planned for NAC, omitting staging in asymptomatic cT1-2N0 disease, considering it for node-positive EBC, and performing it routinely in LABC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33040203
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Yield of Staging Investigations in Patients with Breast Cancer Planned for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

May Lynn Quan, Omar Khan, Alison Laws, Kadhim Taqi et al.
Current Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

The Yield of Staging Investigations in Patients with Breast Cancer Planned for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

May Lynn Quan, Omar Khan, Alison Laws, Kadhim Taqi, Nancy Nixon, Camelia Ursu, Rabia Raheel, Julia Downey, Jeffrey Cao, Susan Isherwood, Sasha Lupichuk
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) represent a diverse population including high-risk early breast cancer (EBC) and locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Staging investigations are routinely performed, but the clinical utility is unclear. METHODS: Using a provincial cancer registry, we identified breast cancer patients referred for NAC between 2020 and 2022. Patients with staging investigations were stratified into EBC (anatomic clinical stage I-II) and LABC (stage III). Rates of metastatic (M1) disease and associated factors were assessed. RESULTS: < 0.001). A higher cT/N stage correlated with M1 disease in LABC, although most subgroups demonstrated rates of ≥10%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support a risk-adapted approach to pre-treatment staging in patients planned for NAC, omitting staging in asymptomatic cT1-2N0 disease, considering it for node-positive EBC, and performing it routinely in LABC.

Current OncologyVol. 33(4)
University of Calgary (CA), Occupational Cancer Research Centre (CA), Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (OM), Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.