Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Lavandula angustifolia Essential Oil for Inhibiting Primary Biofilm Colonizers: An In Vitro Study

Objective: The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Lavandula angustifolia (L. angustifolia) essential oil (EO) in inhibiting bacterial growth and biofilm formation of primary colonizers, such as Streptococcus sanguinis (S. Sanguinis), Streptococcus mitis (S. mitis), and Streptococcus oralis (S. oralis), in an in vitro setting. Methods: Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis was used to examine the oil extracted from L. angustifolia EO by hydrodistillation. Agar well diffusion and broth dilution techniques were performed to evaluate antibacterial activity and Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentrations (MBCs), respectively, against the three American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains. In contrast, the qualitative tube method was performed to assess the antibiofilm effect. Chlorhexidine 0.12% was used as a positive control, and all experiments were performed in triplicate (n = 3). Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 26), with p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: GC–MS identified 25 constituents in L. angustifolia EO, with linalool (20.99%) predominant. The EO (5–20%) showed dose-dependent antibacterial activity, producing inhibition zones up to 16.2 mm compared with 16–18 mm for chlorhexidine. MIC/MBC values (µL/mL) were 1.56/3.125 for S. mitis, 0.39/0.781 for S. oralis, and 0.156/3.12 for S. sanguinis. For the mixed-species consortium, MIC and MBC were 0.156 and 3.12 µL/mL, respectively. The EO demonstrated moderate to weak antibiofilm activity. Conclusions: L. angustifolia EO showed concentration-dependent antibacterial activity against primary oral colonizers. While chlorhexidine 0.12% produced larger inhibition zones overall, L. angustifolia EO at higher concentrations, especially 15%, demonstrated comparable efficacy against S. mitis. These findings suggest its potential as a supplementary therapeutic natural adjunct for preventing early plaque formation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sulaimani dental journal
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17656/sdj.10219
Primary Topic
Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Lavandula angustifolia Essential Oil for Inhibiting Primary Biofilm Colonizers: An In Vitro Study

Faraedon Zardawi, Lara Raouf
Sulaimani dental journal
Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
article

Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Lavandula angustifolia Essential Oil for Inhibiting Primary Biofilm Colonizers: An In Vitro Study

Faraedon Zardawi, Lara Raouf
article en

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Lavandula angustifolia (L. angustifolia) essential oil (EO) in inhibiting bacterial growth and biofilm formation of primary colonizers, such as Streptococcus sanguinis (S. Sanguinis), Streptococcus mitis (S. mitis), and Streptococcus oralis (S. oralis), in an in vitro setting. Methods: Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis was used to examine the oil extracted from L. angustifolia EO by hydrodistillation. Agar well diffusion and broth dilution techniques were performed to evaluate antibacterial activity and Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentrations (MBCs), respectively, against the three American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains. In contrast, the qualitative tube method was performed to assess the antibiofilm effect. Chlorhexidine 0.12% was used as a positive control, and all experiments were performed in triplicate (n = 3). Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 26), with p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: GC–MS identified 25 constituents in L. angustifolia EO, with linalool (20.99%) predominant. The EO (5–20%) showed dose-dependent antibacterial activity, producing inhibition zones up to 16.2 mm compared with 16–18 mm for chlorhexidine. MIC/MBC values (µL/mL) were 1.56/3.125 for S. mitis, 0.39/0.781 for S. oralis, and 0.156/3.12 for S. sanguinis. For the mixed-species consortium, MIC and MBC were 0.156 and 3.12 µL/mL, respectively. The EO demonstrated moderate to weak antibiofilm activity. Conclusions: L. angustifolia EO showed concentration-dependent antibacterial activity against primary oral colonizers. While chlorhexidine 0.12% produced larger inhibition zones overall, L. angustifolia EO at higher concentrations, especially 15%, demonstrated comparable efficacy against S. mitis. These findings suggest its potential as a supplementary therapeutic natural adjunct for preventing early plaque formation.

Sulaimani dental journalVol. 13(1)
University of Sulaimani (IQ), International University (KH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.