Power is not performance: Analysis of laser‐use metrics from a randomised clinical trial comparing low‐ and high‐power ureteroscopic lithotripsy

Objective: Thulium fibre laser (TFL) offers a wide range of power settings during ureteroscopic (URS) lithotripsy, yet the impact of power selection on intraoperative laser-use dynamics remains unclear. The objective of this study was to characterise differences in laser activation patterns between low-power (LP) and high-power (HP) TFL during sheathless URS. Materials and Methods: values. Results: < 0.001). Conclusion: LP and HP TFL lithotripsy result in distinctly different laser-use dynamics during sheathless URS. LP supported sustained, continuous lasing, whereas HP yielded fragmented activation requiring frequent pauses. Coupled with superior stone-free outcomes in the parent trial, these findings suggest that preserving clear endoscopic visibility and more active lasing may be more impactful than increasing laser power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJUI Compass
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70182
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power is not performance: Analysis of laser‐use metrics from a randomised clinical trial comparing low‐ and high‐power ureteroscopic lithotripsy

Øyvind Ulvik, Christian Beisland, Mathias S. Æsøy
BJUI Compass
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Power is not performance: Analysis of laser‐use metrics from a randomised clinical trial comparing low‐ and high‐power ureteroscopic lithotripsy

Øyvind Ulvik, Christian Beisland, Mathias S. Æsøy
article en

Abstract

Objective: Thulium fibre laser (TFL) offers a wide range of power settings during ureteroscopic (URS) lithotripsy, yet the impact of power selection on intraoperative laser-use dynamics remains unclear. The objective of this study was to characterise differences in laser activation patterns between low-power (LP) and high-power (HP) TFL during sheathless URS. Materials and Methods: values. Results: < 0.001). Conclusion: LP and HP TFL lithotripsy result in distinctly different laser-use dynamics during sheathless URS. LP supported sustained, continuous lasing, whereas HP yielded fragmented activation requiring frequent pauses. Coupled with superior stone-free outcomes in the parent trial, these findings suggest that preserving clear endoscopic visibility and more active lasing may be more impactful than increasing laser power.

BJUI CompassVol. 7(4)
Haukeland University Hospital (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.