Moving the field forward on moral injury: Possibilities and pitfalls of experimental research

Research on Moral Injury (MI) is largely based on cross-sectional observational studies, mostly retrospective. Progress in understanding the causal mechanisms between exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) and MI is hindered by a lack of adequate study designs. Current experimental psychopathology paradigms rely on mental imagery, thereby limiting ecological validity and affording minimal scope to model moral decision-making and behavior relevant to MI. We propose two complementary pathways to advance causal inference in the field of MI: leveraging natural experiments to study real-world exposure to PMIE and its associations with MI-related outcomes, and development of new experimental paradigms exploiting behavioral economic games to ethically model moral transgressions in the lab.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2026.102104
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving the field forward on moral injury: Possibilities and pitfalls of experimental research

Philipp Herzog, Simon Stenkamp, Richard J. McNally, Julia A. Glombiewski
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Moving the field forward on moral injury: Possibilities and pitfalls of experimental research

Philipp Herzog, Simon Stenkamp, Richard J. McNally, Julia A. Glombiewski
article en

Abstract

Research on Moral Injury (MI) is largely based on cross-sectional observational studies, mostly retrospective. Progress in understanding the causal mechanisms between exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) and MI is hindered by a lack of adequate study designs. Current experimental psychopathology paradigms rely on mental imagery, thereby limiting ecological validity and affording minimal scope to model moral decision-making and behavior relevant to MI. We propose two complementary pathways to advance causal inference in the field of MI: leveraging natural experiments to study real-world exposure to PMIE and its associations with MI-related outcomes, and development of new experimental paradigms exploiting behavioral economic games to ethically model moral transgressions in the lab.

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental PsychiatryVol. 92
Harvard University (US), University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.