Moving the field forward on moral injury: Possibilities and pitfalls of experimental research
Research on Moral Injury (MI) is largely based on cross-sectional observational studies, mostly retrospective. Progress in understanding the causal mechanisms between exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) and MI is hindered by a lack of adequate study designs. Current experimental psychopathology paradigms rely on mental imagery, thereby limiting ecological validity and affording minimal scope to model moral decision-making and behavior relevant to MI. We propose two complementary pathways to advance causal inference in the field of MI: leveraging natural experiments to study real-world exposure to PMIE and its associations with MI-related outcomes, and development of new experimental paradigms exploiting behavioral economic games to ethically model moral transgressions in the lab.
Authors
- Philipp Herzog (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8267-2083)
- Simon Stenkamp
- Richard J. McNally
- Julia A. Glombiewski
Institutions
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
- Published
- 2026-03-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2026.102104
- Primary Topic
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00